Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 30, 2001 <br />Donlin noted that the timing did not allow for much time for review or response. Mr. <br />Payton explained the document would be sent to the Environmental Quality Board on file <br />for comments on June 4, 2001. The City had two weeks for comments. <br />Trehus questioned if the Council was scheduled to vote on June 23, 2001 could the <br />Planning and Zoning Board address the project at the July meeting. Wessel answered the <br />document could go to the Planning and Zoning Board, then go to the Council directly. <br />Chair Lanyon inquired how the Board should comment. Wessel responded that the <br />project was important enough that another meeting might need to be called. <br />Trehus asked if review of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet in June was possible <br />in view of the permitting schedule. <br />Chair Lanyon inquired if staff could find out when the Planning and Zoning Board would <br />deal with it. <br />Grundhofer noted one of the small businesses was to be a convenience store ' asked if <br />that meant a gas station. Wessel explained that one would be a gas station, one a fast <br />food, and the other a bank. The developer had received stronginterest in all of the <br />locations, but had no formal acceptance. <br />Trehus indicated in past proposals there had been a secon <br />asked about the change. Wessel responded that there were n <br />Drive with no direct access to 77th Street. <br />access on to 77th Street and <br />twoRaccesses to Lake <br />Mr. Payton stated that June 11th would b f, gin= 'f the comment period, with <br />most comments coming in the last we c. Wess =noted the City's comments were to be <br />prepared by the development team. He that the document was the City's. <br />Asleson pointed out a chan <br />the parking lot for infiltration. <br />Donlin questioned whether a vegetative plan had been submitted. Mr. Payton answered <br />that the scattered lands would have various small shrubs and grasses, and noted that <br />they would be similar to the` plantings in the other areas. <br />'�; ^,y',1. „eta <br />Grundhofer asked if the ponds in the East still existed. Mr. Payton indicated the two <br />ponds in e twere now depressions for infiltration. <br />an nib <br />tided vegetative islands scattered throughout <br />of <br />Trehus inquired if the Environmental Assessment Worksheet addressed the impact of the <br />impervious surfaces on the Chain of Lakes. Mr. Payton responded that it dealt with <br />various issues such as habitat and vegetation among others, but not the water table <br />because it was so complex. The typical runoff would flow out of a two -inch pipe, with a <br />6 -8 inch pipe for overflow. <br />3 <br />