Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MAY 30, 2001 <br />There needed to be a mechanism to force the City to stay within the set numbers. If there <br />was a mechanism to limit development, it would aid the rate of project reviews. Chair <br />Lanyon concurred there needed to be a mechanism to enforce the caps. <br />E. Communications with other bodies in the City — Trehus requested E- Mailing the <br />minutes to Board members after the City received them from TimeSaver Secretarial. <br />Chair Lanyon agreed and asked staff to check into getting the minutes to the Board <br />members right after they were prepared. <br />Trehus suggested appointing a recommendation reviewer, who would oversee the word <br />usage in the recommendations prior to forwarding them to someone else. That person <br />should also obtain the Planning and Zoning packets regularly to make sure they addressed <br />the Board's recommendations adequately. The Board unanimously agreed to appoint <br />Trehus to the position. <br />O'Connell had volunteered to go to the Planning and Zoning Board meeting, but in the <br />future would probably stay only for the project reviews. <br />Asleson indicated someone could attend the work sessions on the Wednesdays before the <br />City Council meetings. The Park Board has an ongoing item on the agenda. <br />Chair Lanyon asked staff to obtain schedules for the Plarimng and Zoning Board meetings <br />and the work sessions, and try to get the Board on the agenda for updates. In addition, <br />Chair Lanyon expressed frustration on behalf of the Board. a urged staff to invite the <br />new Community Development Director to theext meeting. <br />of t eninutes before the Planning and <br />O'Connell stated she would like to have <br />Zoning Board meeting. <br />PROGRAM / PROJECT UPDATES. <br />A. Grant Updates — This item asaafbledxtoahe June 27, 2001 meeting. <br />B. Minnesota DNR/Wiltnd Interface — This item was tabled to the June 27, 2001 <br />meeting. <br />C. Solid Waste/Reeycling Updates — This item was tabled to the June 27, 2001 meeting. <br />D. Pond Contamination - Asleson stated he visited a site where there was a failed septic <br />system. land`s sensitive, and a nearby pond lab samples were being taken, and <br />tested at In ' ;rpol. The watershed district sent their biologist to investigate the problem. It <br />is a surface water quality concern as well as a health concern, because of the possibility of <br />waterborne E. Coli contaminating nearby wells. <br />11 <br />