Laserfiche WebLink
satisfied. Ten acres must still be found to satisfy the 2:1 <br />requirement. Site one still has three and one -third acres of <br />public value credit, as does site two; (3 1/3 + 3 1/3 = 6 2/3). <br />An additional three and one -third acres of either new wetland ' <br />credit or public value credit must be found to meet the <br />additional acreage requirements. <br />G. Special cases or appeals. For projects of unusual <br />complexity, or replacement plans that have been denied and are <br />being appealed, and for which the local government unit believes <br />an alternative evaluation process may produce a substantially <br />different replacement requirement, the local government unit may <br />evaluate the replacement plan using the current version of the <br />Minnesota wetland evaluation methodology or another <br />scientifically accepted methodology approved by the board, in <br />consultation with the commissioner, that evaluates all wetland <br />functions and values for both the impacted and replacement <br />wetlands. <br />When using the Minnesota wetland evaluation methodology or <br />another board, in consultation with the commissioner, approved <br />methodology to evaluate replacement plans, the ratio of impact <br />wetland to replacement wetland must not be less than the minimum <br />acreage requirements as listed in part 8420.0540, subpart 6. <br />Further, the hydrologic unit ratio in item D, subitem (2), the <br />inlet and outlet characteristics ratio in item D, subitem (3), <br />and the local public value ratio, if any, in item D, subitem <br />(4), must also be considered when using the Minnesota wetland <br />evaluation methodology or another board, in consultation with <br />the commissioner, approved methodology. <br />H. Adequacy decision. A replacement plan that fails <br />to meet the requirements in items A to G must be considered <br />inadequate in replacing lost functions and values and shall not <br />be approved by the local government unit. A replacement plan <br />that has been considered by the local government unit and not <br />approved may be revised and resubmitted for consideration by the <br />local government unit. As required by part 8420.0250, the <br />decision of a local government unit to approve, approve with <br />conditions, or not approve a replacement plan becomes final if <br />not appealed to the board within 30 days after the date on which <br />the decision is mailed to those required to receive notice of <br />the decision. Before construction of the replacement wetland <br />may proceed, the notice specified in part 8420.0530, item D, <br />subitem (6), must be recorded and proof of recording provided to <br />the local government unit. <br />I. Replacement wetlands eligible for RIM. A <br />landowner who drains or fills a wetland and replaces it by <br />restoring an impacted wetland on the landowner's property under <br />an approved replacement plan may apply to the board for <br />enrollment of the replacement wetland into the Reinvest in <br />Minnesota program no sooner than one year after completion of <br />the replacement project. <br />56 <br />