My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
07/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 4:27:23 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 10:03:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local governments should also note that MS 103B.3365 requires that local water <br />management plans specify controls that implement best available technology to: <br />• minimize off-site. runoff <br />• maximize overland flow over vegetated surfaces <br />• replicate pre - development hydrologic conditions <br />• minimize off -site discharge of pollutants to ground or surface water <br />• encourage natural filtration functions <br />While these guidelines are not rules and consequently do not have the force and <br />effect of law, local governments will avoid excessive scrutiny and potential citizen <br />lawsuits if they can demonstrate that they are in compliance with these guidelines. <br />Local governments may not require a state agency (such as the Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation or the Minnesota Department of Natural <br />Resources) to comply with this law. When local agencies review state projects, <br />attention should be given to whether MS 103B3365 would apply if the project was <br />in fact a private project. In such cases, the local government and the state agency <br />should cooperate to the degree practical to provide for adequate retention of <br />surface water. Instances where a state agency is uncooperative should be brought <br />to the attention of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. <br />• Part IL - Definitions. The following definitions apply to interpretations of <br />Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.3365 and these guidelines: <br />Subpart L Best Available Technology or BAT. Best available technology means <br />Best Management Practice or BMP. <br />Subpart 2. Best Management Practice or BMP. Best management practice means <br />erosion and sediment control and water quality management practices that are the most <br />effective and practicable.means of controlling, preventing, and minimizing degradation of <br />surface water, including construction-phasing, minimizing the length of time soil areas <br />are exposed, prohibitions, and other management practices published by state or <br />designated area wide planning agencies. <br />Subpart 3. Impervious Surface. Impervious surface means a constructed hard <br />surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil and causes water <br />to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than prior to <br />development Examples include, but are not limited to, rooftops, sidewalks, patios, <br />storage areas, and roads, streets, driveways and parking lots constructed of concrete, <br />asphalt or compacted soils. <br />Subpart 4. New development. New development means any project, including re- <br />development projects that create more than one acre of impervious surface over what <br />8/25/93 Version 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.