My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
07/25/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 4:27:23 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 10:03:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br />ATTACHMENT B <br />121/93 <br />METROPOLITAN COUNCIL <br />Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 <br />612 291 -6359 TDD 612 291 -0904 <br />MODEL STORM WATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE • <br />The model storm water management ordinance should assist communities in the Twin Cities <br />metropolitan area in implementing the Metropolitan Council's Interim Strategy to Reduce Nonpoint <br />Source Pollution to All Metropolitan Water Bodies. The Council adopted the strategy for the <br />Minnesota River Basin, effective September 30,1992, and for the remainder of the metropolitan area <br />effective January 1, 1993. The strategy includes three essential requirements. These requirements <br />are important components to addressing the water quality problems caused by nonpoint source <br />pollution in the metropolitan area. <br />The first requirement is that local governments throughout the metropolitan area must adopt design <br />standards for new storm water ponds that will reduce the contaminant loadings from surface water <br />runoff. One set of design criteria that is widely accepted is from the National Urban Runoff Program <br />(NURP). The second requirement is that local governments in the metropolitan area must also <br />follow the urban 'best management practices" as outlined in protecting Water Quality in Urban <br />Areas, published by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, or an equivalent set of standards. <br />Sections 8.1 through 8.16 of the model ordinance detail suggested design criteria and best <br />management practices. These sections form the heart of the ordinance. The remaining sections of <br />the model ordinance are not as critical. The remaining sections essentially establish a process for the <br />implementation of the design criteria and best management practices. <br />The third requirement is that all local governments in the metropolitan area must adopt the <br />Minnesota Department of Natural Resour .choreland regulations. These regulations are found in <br />Statewide Standards For Management of Shorelaand Areas published by the Minnesota Department <br />of Natural Resources. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has established a timeline <br />and format for the adoption of the shoreland regulations. The model ordinance does not address the <br />shoreland regulations. Local governments should work with the Minnesota Department of Natural <br />Resources to determine the most effective way to implement the shoreland regulations. <br />The model ordinance is intended to be a resource for communities to use in adopting official controls <br />which are consistent with design standards for new storm water ponds which will reduce the <br />contaminant loadings from surface water runoff and which are consistent with the "best management <br />practices" for land development with respect to storm water runoff. The ordinance provides a <br />comprehensive approach to addressing the issue of storm water runoff. <br />It is impossible to draft a model ordinance to fit perfectly into all of the innumerable varieties of <br />regulatory programs that exist at the local government level. The ordinance is designed to be adapted <br />to the unique characteristics of each local government organization. The ordinance could be <br />combined with or replace existing ordinances, such as erosion control ordinances, which address issues <br />covered by the model ordinance. It is presumed that some provisions of the ordinance will be <br />modified or possibly even rejected altogether. Other provisions may have to be added. The <br />ordinance can be used as a "checklist" by local governments to analyze the adequacy of existing <br />controls. If a local government determines that a major element, such as inspection and maintenance, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.