My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/29/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
08/29/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:22:44 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 10:37:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
08/29/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JULY 18, 2001 <br />The motion passed 3 -2, with Chair Lanyon and O'Connell voting against. <br />The Board members in favor worked out the language of the motion. The motion stated <br />that the Board recommends: <br />• Tabling the decision until the submission of additional information, i.e. Rice Creek <br />Watershed District and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. <br />• Metropolitan Council states an analysis of impacts of water runoff from the site must be <br />completed before an Environmental Impact Statement determination can be made. <br />• Metropolitan Council recommends the applicant try to reduce runoff volume to <br />predevelopment conditions. <br />• The Environmental Board should review and comment following the submission of <br />additional information. <br />Trehus moved that prior to a negative declaration, the City should adopt a policy that <br />defines how the City will address development projects with more than ten acres of <br />impervious surfaces. O'Connell seconded the motion for discussion. <br />O'Connell pointed out she did want the policy, but it woul•ot impact this project. <br />Chair Lanyon indicated that making the motion wou <br />motion. <br />Trehus amended the above motion to remove th <br />seconded the motion to amend. <br />ish the impact of the prior <br />"prior to a declaration." O'Connell <br />Chair Lanyon explained that he voted agal motion because it would not say why <br />or where it was going. <br />Grunhofer stated that there i Council who did not understand the <br />importance of it. <br />Kukonen noted that:eeting : s planned with the City Council and the Board was going <br />to raise the issue as a g <br />Trehus withdrew the motion, with the understanding that it be put on the agenda for the <br />next meeting. <br />Chair Lanyon suggested the goals move from a global perspective to a project by project <br />basis and then have the Board prioritize them in order of importance. <br />CLOSE MEETING AND CONFIRM NEXT MEETING DATE <br />It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on July 25, 2001. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.