My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/26/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
09/26/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:09:56 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 11:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
09/26/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING <br />Page 7, fifth paragraph: <br />GG <br />AUGUST 29, 2001 <br />!! <br />Trehus moved to approve the July 18, 2001 meeting minutes as amended above. <br />O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />APPROVAL OF AGENDA <br />The following item was added to the meeting agenda: <br />• Discuss 5E the MarketPlace Update as a part of 5A the Ryan Target Update. <br />The agenda was approved as amended above. <br />CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />Donlin indicated that two residents had called her by phone stating their desire to comment on <br />Board Business, but had scheduling conflicts and may be late. <br />PROJECT REVIEW <br />A. Ryan/Target/Target Super Store/Update — G ": a s that throughout the life of <br />the project there had been dramatic change, ev r the Co il denied the project with <br />two abstaining. Wetland mitigation had be �.' + i�� sion item. There had been two <br />meetings concerning the reduction of ponding . #;_ ` creasing the infiltration basins. The <br />landscaping plan indicated 788 trees be mo New improvements would have <br />been necessary to Lake Drive, in additi sidy issue. <br />Chair Lanyon inquired abo atersh «;• istrict's response. Grochala responded that <br />the technology panel did �� �,,,� with the volume issue, but with rate control. <br />They were seeking to r � e i + a on areas and keep the ponding area <br />Chair Lanyon p + __ a ques 'A + n " it became a project again, what would be the role of <br />the Environmental chala answered that the Environmental Assessment <br />Worksheet was still in e • proval process. <br />Donlin stated previously Asleson lead several Environmental Board members to the site, <br />which she revisited recently and noted the biodiversity, such as mature oaks, black <br />cherries, pheasants, and tamaracks. She added that there was considerable neighborhood <br />opposition to the project. She visited the SuperTarget at Lexington and Highway 694, <br />and described it as a vast asphalt expanse. She noted some small saplings, the infiltration <br />pond was fenced off because it was deep, and had garbage in it. <br />Chair Lanyon stated that the Board tried to move the project toward an ecological <br />balance. He indicated the Board was not displeased that the project was stopped. Donlin <br />explained that the outcome represented the 20/20 vision, with a prairie -rural flavor to the <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.