My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/26/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
09/26/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2014 3:09:56 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 11:28:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
09/26/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JUNE 27, 2001 <br />Trehus explained that Target would not be affected, only new submittals. <br />Kukonen mentioned that a moratorium would inhibit arguments with developers. <br />Donlin reviewed that several years ago the City enacted two back to back six -month <br />moratoriums. Trehus added that with 450 units already in process, a moratorium was a <br />needed step for the City. <br />The motion carried unanimously. <br />Trehus inquired of Grochala to review the Preservation Zoning District. O'Connell <br />suggested the letter be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board. <br />Asleson indicated the Board could meet July 18, however it would be too early for <br />comment on projects and applications. Chair Lanyon explained in order to comment on <br />the Environmental Audit Worksheet, the Board should meet before July 23, 2001 with <br />either a special meeting or an additional meeting. Since the Board was not having an <br />impact on projects, the meeting could be moved to July 18, 2001. <br />Grochala stated the Board could move the meeting to July 18, 2001 for comments on the <br />Environmental Audit Worksheet, with the following meeting the second week in August <br />because the Watershed District is meeting on July 25, 2001. The Council meets on the <br />13th and the 23rd for the Environmental Audit Worksheet. <br />Chair Lanyon noted the Board would meet on both July 18, 2001 and July 25, 2001. <br />B. Environmental Board Goals 2001 — T s item was discussed as part of Environmental <br />Board Business A. <br />C. Environmental Assessment Worksheet Comments/Target/Ryan — This item was <br />discussed as part of Environmental; Board Business A. <br />D. Shade Tree Ordinance/Tree Preservation/Discussion — Asleson wrote the document <br />with models used in the East because there was no working model in the State. The <br />document included a tree preservation policy that was bound by the Council. It required <br />the developer to replace the trees in public areas and developments. The City attorney <br />advised against banks, and opposed the tree replacement. The issue of policy versus <br />ordinance could be revisited. <br />Grundhofer indicated that the definition of wood lot was a tree area of one acre and was <br />under the tree preservation policy, with 25% of the area having large trees. She asked <br />staff if the policy could apply to the oaks in Highland Meadows. Asleson answered it <br />was included as a part of the zoning code in policy form and the developer had not <br />complied. The policies were guidelines, but there was no means for enforcement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.