Laserfiche WebLink
minutes to reach the first layer of the ground water system. An area that is extremely <br />low in sensitivity to ground water pollution surrounds most of the rest of the island. This <br />area is labeled as taking from years to a century for contaminants to reach the first level <br />of the groundwater. The Study sited above includes flow systems, aquifer capacity, <br />ground water chemistry, and near - surface deposits and bedrock considerations. <br />Barr Engineering (Exhibit 9) establishes the need for site - sensitivity analysis, to prevent <br />ground water contamination. Any kind of infiltration system must consider the above <br />study considerations the Barr report states. Furthermore, Barr states that the seasonal <br />high water table must be far enough below the bottom of the infiltration basin (at least 3 <br />feet) to allow the structure to function hydraulically and to allow trapping and treatment <br />of pollutants by the soil (MPCA 2000). <br />Both proposed ponds on the island are typical storm water conveyance, non- attenuated <br />water holding devices. Both ponds are excavations into organic soils (Exhibit 6), below <br />the normal water levels of the lake. Again, the western pond is in an extremely <br />sensitive, ground -water area. Recommendations based on Barr Engineering BMPS <br />suggest neither pond should be built. <br />Swale: <br />The proposed infiltration swale on the North side of the island appears to be set in <br />organic soils. This swale design is also contradicted in the Barr BMP Manual. <br />Alternatives might include using the two proposed lot areas on the eastern side of the <br />island for an infiltration /stormwater management area. Lot reduction may be necessary <br />to accommodate some of the concerns of surface water runoff. The infiltration swale on <br />the north side would have little benefit in terms of infiltration, and would not meet criteria <br />for suggested BMS for such a swale. Existing vegetation would be lost as well in the <br />process. Another possible alternative might be to move the swale idea to the North side <br />of the proposed road and design a filter system that would move surface water to an <br />infiltration area on the East (where ground water pollution is less of a concern). <br />Removing two lots on the West Side of the island would allow for a suitable area that <br />could be used for infiltration and surface water treatment. The site would need to be <br />reestablished with native vegetation. In addition, the lots themselves should be <br />designed with on -lot infiltration as suggested in Metropolitan Council /Barr Engineering <br />Co BMP manual for Surface Water Management (Exhibit 10). One other alternative <br />would be to cluster houses in one area of the island and use the rest of the island for <br />surface water management. <br />Trees: <br />The Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Tree Preservation Plan shows a "Tree <br />Preservation Limit" line for Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition. I have indicated to the <br />developer that we need an inventory of the trees on the island to develop such a plan. <br />Our Tree Ordinance makes the inventory mandatory in proposed soil disturbance areas. <br />The entire island is a proposed soil disturbance area. Only the proposed house pad <br />locations are shown on the maps. Missing are driveways, surface water treatment <br />areas, backfill issues on landscaping, etc. Lot 5 for example would have 5.7 feet of <br />basement excavation. Lot 5 would be the eastern most lot. Lot 1, would have 3.2 feet <br />