HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/27/2002 Env Bd Packet•
•
City of Lino Lakes
Environmental Board Meeting
February 27, 2002
6:30 p.m.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. OPEN MIKE
5. ACTION ITEMS
6. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Development Regulations Task Force Update
B. Goals /2003
C. Earth Day /Arbor Day
D. City News Letter
E. Environmental Board Ordinance and Job Description
7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. Forestry
B. Solid Waste Recycling
C. Environmental
8. ADJOURN
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : January 30, 2002
TIME STARTED : 6:38 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 9:56 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Amy Donlin, Constance Grundhofer, Patrice Halen,
Rod Kukonen, Theresa O'Connell, Mary Jo O'Dea, and
Nikki Schneider.
MEMBERS ABSENT : None.
Staff members present: Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, and Community
Development Director Michael Grochala.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Kukonen called the meeting to order at 6:38 p.m.
Board members introduced themselves.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• A. December 19, 2001— The following co i were requested:
•
Page 5, tenth paragraph: " Kukonen " t s catching the water on the opposite
side of the island bridge."
Page 10, second paragraph:
Pioneer Press that ranked Lino
highest and Circle Pines 13th high
oted an article in the Friday edition of the
1t1i
highest from 45th and Centerville was 2nd
for tax rates based on a $130,000 home."
Page 10, eleventh paragraph: `By Tom Johnson's home there was found a rare specie&
called -pew unique high quality poor fen sedge subtype."
Donlin moved to approve the December 19, 2001 meeting minutes. O'Connell seconded
the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair Kukonen inquired about the previous unapproved minutes. Staff answered that
they would be brought before the Board at a later meeting.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The following items were added to the meeting agenda:
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING
JANUARY 30, 2002
• Move Item 6A, Wildland Urban Interface /Completed Project Report/Peggy Booth,
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, to follow Open Mike.
• Move Item 6B, Peltier Lake/Proposed Boating Restrictions/Heron Nesting Area, to
follow Open Mike.
• Discuss Environmental Board Business under section 8 with:
8A. Goals
8B. Earth Day
8C. City Newsletter
8D. By -laws
• Discuss the adjourn section under Item 9.
The amended agenda was approved unanimously.
4. OPEN MIKE
No citizen comments were made.
6. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Wildland Urban Interface/Co a Pr ect Report/Peggy Booth,
Minnesota Department of Natural Re Asleson explained that two
years ago the City joined wit
been completed, the results
headed the task force an
He introduced Peggy
were presented to eac
bound folders.
Hugo on a joint project which had
d tools for the City. Peggy Booth
veth did the land classification with the maps
ue the discussion. The results of the study
mbers of the Environmental Board by staff in
•
Ms. Booth stated she had worked with many people and cities that needed
information, but received conflicting recommendations, even from within the
DNR. The U.S. Forestry had grant money available toward holistic and integrated
management. This project received a $50,000 grant. She described the contents
of the binder and noted the booklet, "Beyond the Suburbs" which covered issues
such as gardening, forestry, wetland management, and other topics aimed at
landowners of smaller acreage. The bulk of the notebook contained the
appendices. Ms. Booth highlighted the notebook as tools with reference materials
and a series of five checklists, which provide a guide through the development of
ordinances. The purple sheet indicated the overlays that were preserved. The
blue sheet showed that Hugo did an environmental review for giving density
bonuses, or a higher number of houses on a plat in exchange for compliance with
certain conservation items. The green sheet showed how natural areas needed to
be managed, and identified the types of things needed.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
Chair Kukonen stated the information was useful, and was what was needed right
now. Ms. Booth responded that the case studies for the information would be the
Tree Protection Ordinance and the Landscape Ordinance.
Asleson indicated that the Board would be electing two members to sit on a panel
for ordinance revision.
Ms. Booth stated that the information would result in better Natural Resource
Assessments. The Minnesota Landcover Classification System received some of
the money dedicated to it and maps made up a large part of the appendices.
Mr. Husveth stated he worked with Critical Connections Landscape Ecology, and
noted that he covered 38,000 acres in Blaine, Ham Lake, Lino Lakes, and
Columbus Township. He found 40 rare species within the City. Some were
significant in the State and had not been seen for up to 75 years. He was
attempting to identify a greenway between the Rice L e Chain of Lakes and
Carlos Avery to guide development. He used the dcover Classification
System's five levels, with land use as the lowest ve sed on soil, vegetation,
imperviousness and hydrology. An example = vet 1 a forest, Level 2
would be a deciduous forest, Level 3 Upl . °. • us f rest, Level 4 oak forest,
and Level 5 was Oak forest dry subtype, the m detail, and field checked. The
map used standard colors to depict var d c ers. The dark areas were
residential and mostly impervious, the forest, brown was herbaceous
and wetland areas, the beige . ere s bs, and blue was open water. The
second map showed the tre . o • and the darkest color was 80 -100%
land cover.
Ms. Booth stated th . opy c er has been linked with air quality, heat affecting
temperatures, and other
Mr. Husveth pointed out the third map labeled MLCSS which identified areas of
high, moderate, and low quality in the City, with white showing the areas which
no longer had natural significance. He credited Asleson with the discovery of the
area of wet meadow with rich fen along the pipeline corridor. He noted an
unidentified species of plant was found to be classified as the common name tooth
cup and was last sighted in 1987 in Cedar Creek. Special interest sites were a
residential area adjacent to the prison that could be a neighborhood project, and an
aspen forest in the northwest even though there were no rare species found there.
He added that the maps could be overlaid on other maps because of the G.I.S.
Asleson stated that Mr. Husveth included notes that gave clarifications and greater
detail that the maps could not show.
•
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
Ms. Booth indicated that the data could be shown differently, depending on the
issues they were linked to. She explained that Ham Lake and Columbus
Township were going to be completed in the next month or so to Level 3.
Asleson mentioned that it was helpful to review the Saddle Club with the maps.
Chair Kukonen thanked Mr. Husveth and stated that the depth of the information
would be very helpful.
Mr. Husveth stated he would try to get it put together with a brief summary
incorporating the school site.
Chair Kukonen stated the study was timely for the zoning and ordinance reviewal.
Ms. Booth noted another assessment wildlife biologists put together a report on
wildlife habitats and corridors. The results showed there were five general areas:
the Chain of Lakes up through Duck Pass with nesting loons and bald eagles; Elm
Crest with Hardwood Creek, an area with birds depend -nt on grasslands; in the
South two sites around Cedar Lake and Holly Driv • Lake Amelia had 200
species documented in the area, including the B . di Turtle. Appendix D was
the Forest Health Assessment that identified . iv- plan unities using
satellite imagery at Level 2 and was availa s' :`'_ .I.S., although it was not
reliable in developed areas. The DNR was wo " ' s g with others in thinning the
areas of high risk for oak wilt. Fire Ri ano - r application studied where
firefighters assessed houses from the str e 917 homes, 405 were high
risk, and 35 were extreme risk e. a neighborhoods were identified to be
of high risk. Asleson added m_ re risk would also increase the integrity
of the woodlands and the - . 're • ogi al community.
Ms. Booth indicate.' ld apply the information in reviewing planning
documents, and for the r '' endations for the Comprehensive Plan. There
were two applications at t `` subdivision scale in Hugo but not an issue at the time
for Lino Lakes. There was a development of the Alternative Urban Area Wide
Review (AUAR) as an option instead of the standard Environmental Review that
would include a comprehensive impact assessment including a mitigation
recommendation. Twelve hundred acres were evaluated in Hugo, resulting in a
park and open space plan looking at trails and connecting with Elm Crest. The
second was the area south of Victor Gardens, a project of several hundred acres
calling for the protection of open spaces. An ecologist gave the recommendation
of restoration and land use. Asleson explained the City of Hugo was in ordinance
review during the project, and that the City of Lino Lakes had the benefit of the
tools of the completed project to guide the review.
Donlin stated there was nice detail, but she would like to see more information so
that the City could preserve valuable areas.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
Ms. Booth noted an area in Blaine would probably die out, so the issue now is
mitigating the damage. Mr. Husveth added that the species in question require
some disturbance, but when an area is developed, the area would be stabilized,
and there would be no periodic burns occurring. To aid planning, Mr. Husveth
had recorded the data as a point to indicate the central area.
Mr. J. P. Houchins pointed out the information would be helpful to focus on the
corridors, and urged the Board to identify bite -sized locations that need to be
preserved, and the stakeholders. He recommended the Board come up with ways
to compensate the stakeholders to be partners, and admitted that it was primarily a
political endeavor at this point.
Donlin inquired about Mr. J. P. Houchins' availability to provide technical
support to assist in choosing the bite -sized pieces, so that press releases could be
made, and it could be made attractive to those involved. She asked Mr. Husveth
to stay for the next discussion item on the maple basswood forest.
B. Peltier Lake/Proposed Boating Restrictio eron Nesting Area —
Asleson reviewed the background material. Pel • L Island was classified as
the second largest nesting area for the Great : h ' eron, also a nesting site for
Great White Egret. The birds have moved ' othe nesting sites to this
one, theoretically due to development. Other p • 'ble factors include aerial water
pick up of water by the DNR and high E • nst ion. In 1998 a permit was
issued for a private water skiing slalom `' ' egulating use of lakes is
delegated to local government ely t City of Lino Lakes and the City of
Centerville through a joint .: ee s nt and ordinance. Another factor is
water quality impact of t ; _ • wer d boat propeller causing unusual algae
blooms and disturban ► of u' a _etation along the shoreline in this area The
herons begin nestin ril, there is a need to process the regulation as soon
as possible. Wayne Le d been monitoring the area Asleson handed out a
letter from Mr. Lanyon.
Donlin stated that the City Charter contained a provision to speed up the approval
process if the appropriate terms were used. Asleson stated that Centerville might
not have that or a similar provision.
Donlin stated that the Minnesota Guidelines for water - skiing were not as strict as
for hunters.
Mr. LeBlanc discussed his concerns about intensive use of the lake on the north
side of the island. In April of 1999, a meeting was held explaining the sensitivity
of the area. In 1998, the sheriff gave water skiers a permit to set up a course in the
southern part of the lake. A course could be set up daily without a permit. Mr.
LeBlanc believed that everyone should have equal access. There is no regulation
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
for controlling the water skiing, and fishing had been disturbed as well. He would
like to see:
• A no wake zone from the island north to protect the birds.
• No structures on the lake.
• No trespassing on the island.
Mr. LeBlanc requested the Board make a recommendation. He explained that
Centerville did not have a provision for an emergency ordinance process.
Centerville would meet February 13, 2002. The wording needed to be identical
between the cities but Centerville did not know if it would send the ordinance
through Planning and Zoning, or Parks and Recreation.
Asleson indicated that according to scenario # 2, the two species appeared to
coexist in terms of food quantity and food quality, as well as disease.
Donlin added that human disturbance was stated as t ost probable. She stated
that if a gentleman's agreement was not working, t ' • ublic hearing process was
probably necessary. Donlin believed the site sh a d • tally protected and
closed to all traffic.
Asleson stated the City might not want to total ` ose the site off due to the
cultural aspect. Donlin explained there ;r • e a`= rrible impact.
Asleson submitted, for the s pedi'' cy, that the issue of regulation be
limited to the issue of inten
O'Connell inquired i a dis``• could affect the food chain. Asleson
answered that egrets pon • "' eeders, and the east side was an area where they
gathered their nesting ma The County was working on ensuring there was
appropriate nesting materi s in the area.
Donlin stated all the necessary elements were present.
Asleson noted in the ordinance, the first part needed to be worded exactly.
Mr. LeBlanc stated that it had to be passed by the Anoka County Board. Asleson
gave it to the Chief of Police, who indicated that the word "boating" in section 2
needed to be clarified and Section 4 and 6 needed to state exactly the same. Ms.
Joan Galli assured staff that if the words were used exactly, the ordinance would
get approved.
Mr. LeBlanc pointed out that people did not want the ski course in the middle of
the lake.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
Donlin noted another reason for the no wake zone was that the birds plunge dive
to feed feet first, and they need to be able to see into the water.
Mr. LeBlanc restated that they were looking for the regulation of structures on the
lake.
Asleson asked the Board for a recommendation for the next Council meeting.
Chair Kukonen indicated the County owned the land, and could enforce a buffer.
Asleson explained that the buffer would be only 300 feet, and that a joint local
level enforcement was also necessary.
Donlin asked if the County would have jurisdiction because it owns the land and
the course was attached to the bottom. Schneider answered it was the regulation
of the water, not the land, and the water goes with it.
Mr. LeBlanc explained the surface water was not the '; isdiction of the County,
but local. The north side was clear because of the atic plants present. Donlin
agreed even if it was not about the birds, the pl - m . to the water quality.
O'Dea inquired if the no wake restriction a •..; para e from the structures on
the lake. Asleson stated it would not happen imely fashion.
A discussion ensued on slalom courses " a - ing.
Mr. LeBlanc indicated ther
size of the lake. It involv
there were 40 other f
cared about the issu
recedence for these requests on the
that were using the slalom course, but
e association. He believed the community
Donlin asked if there were y concerns of the Council.
Asleson stated that the focus of the recommendation should be the resource issue.
He asked the Board for a recommendation.
Schneider recommended that a no wake zone be enforced 24 hours a day, and no
structures be put on the lake.
O'Connell inquired if the structures or the actual water skiing caused the
disturbance. Mr. LeBlanc responded that the structures cause intense activity in
one area that created a channel at about 34 miles/hour.
Asleson stated that it would not be in effect in the south part of the lake, from an
environmental standpoint.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
Mr. LeBlanc mentioned in 2000, he did not see any birds. Donlin answered that it
could have been due to the loss of the young.
Asleson stated the lake could be regulated, but the value of the cultural uses of the
people should receive consideration. Ms. Galli suggested a line east and west
from the island.
Mr. LeBlanc noted that a no wake zone would protect the site for now.
Donlin inquired about Ms. Galli's willingness to assist with the ordinance.
Asleson responded that she already had, and if the Board wanted to review the
ordinance before it went to Council, a special meeting would need to be called.
O'Dea noted they had permits to put up the structures in 1998 and 2001.
Asleson stated that the Board had made a recommendation to deny the permit.
Donlin pointed out that they had been in violation.
Asleson explained that an ordinance was neede s a ce. He suggested
Thursday, February 7, 2002 for a meeting to iew the ance. Schneider
added they needed to ensure the alternativ _ sect n was not vague.
Asleson pointed out the need for a use sr 'ion line.
Chair Kukonen asked for a mo
it needed additional langua
work with the City of Ce
O'Connell made a
County of Anoka, City o
o ad °`'t the recommendation. Asleson stated
Le : c's recommendation to direct staff to
e s ruary 7, 2002.
ept the ordinance from the State of Minnesota,
akes using section 3A and no alternatives:
• Slow no wake speed 24 hours /day all year on that portion of the lake north of a
line extending east and west from (and including) the south end of the large
island.
• City staff works with the City of Centerville to draft a mutually acceptable
ordinance that will pass in the City of Centerville and City of Lino Lakes, so
that it leaves no loopholes or misunderstanding of intent.
• Addresses the placement of structures on the lake. Incorporates regulation -
addressing structures on the lake.
• Create a joint powers agreement between the City of Lino Lakes and the City
of Centerville.
Friendly amendments were made by Board and staff and accepted by O'Connell.
O'Dea seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
Donlin submitted easy language for the Council.
Grundhofer made a motion to pass on the letter to Council. O'Connell seconded
the motion.
Grundhofer stated she had lived in the City for 26 years, and had seen the birds'
decline in numbers. A discussion ensued on the history of the project.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ha len excused herself from the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Chair Kukonen called for a
5- minute break, resuming at 9:30 p.m.
The Board reconvened at 9:32 p.m.
4. ACTION ITEMS
D. Election of Officers - Chair Kukonen called r nations for the office of
Chairman.
Grundhofer nominated Kukonen for the office hairman. Ha len seconded the
nomination.
Grundhofer made a motion to
Chairman. Ha len seconde
nations and elect Kukonen as the
otion carried unanimously.
Chair Kukonen calle r no ' at s for the office of Vice Chair.
Donlin nominated Schne +r the office of Vice Chair. O'Connell seconded
the nomination.
Donlin made a motion to close the nominations and elect Schneider as the Vice
Chair. Grundhofer seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
6. DISCUSSION ITEMS - continued
A. Wildland Urban Interface/Completed Project Report/Peggy Booth,
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources — This item was discussed earlier
in the meeting.
B. Peltier Lake/Proposed Boating Restrictions/Heron Nesting Area —
This item was discussed earlier in the meeting.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
C. Development Regulations Task Force - Grochala gave a brief overview
of the Development Task Force. In June 2001, the Comprehensive Plan was
adopted. The next step was to review the ordinances to make sure they were in
compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. He needed two members for the Task
Force that would be chaired by O'Donnell. Grochala explained that on February
21, the 12 -month residential moratorium would begin. Review of the Subdivision
Ordinance would need to be finished by July, to go to Council in September.
Zoning review would need to be completed by September. Grochala explained
that more meeting times would be favored over extending the deadline. Growth
management would be the major issue and the goal was to address the issues
equally, and arrive at a consensus with the Boards.
Chair Kukonen confirmed that the Board needed three nominees, with one being
the alternate, and the delegates would report back to the Board. He called for
nominations.
Donlin nominated Chair Kukonen. Grundhofer nominated Donlin. O'Connell
nominated Schneider.
Grochala stated the meetings were open so al - e cou end if they so
desired. Two would be active, but the alte • ld al o receive all the
information.
It was indicated that Chair Kukonen an .a: �. ' ould be the delegates, with
Schneider as the alternate. Al .ted e nominations.
Grochala noted the entire
en taff would be involved in the entire
process. He thanked Bo. ` Hers for attending the recent seminar.
7. DEPARTMENT REP
A.
Forestry — This item was tabled to the February 27, 2002 meeting.
B. Solid Waste Recycling/Solid Waste Report July 1, 2001 to December
31,2001— This item was tabled to the February 27, 2002 meeting.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BUSINESS
A. Goals — This item was tabled to the February 27, 2002 meeting.
B. Earth Day — Grundhofer suggested that the focus be on endangered plants
and animals. Asleson stated there would be an Earth Day meeting on Friday. He
asked for small project ideas for community projects. He suggested this be
discussed at the next meeting. He expressed the desire to do a direct mailing for
the booklet, "Beyond the Suburbs."
10
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 30, 2002
C. City Newsletter — Chair Kukonen noted the newsletter deadline was past,
but suggested the Board be a regular contributor.
D. By -laws — This item was tabled to the February 27, 2002 meeting.
9. ADJOURN
It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on February 27,
2002.
There being no further business, Grundhofer moved to adjourn at 9:56 p.m. Halen
seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Brigette Biesi
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
11
• Agenda Item 6A
Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Topic: Development Regulations Task Force Update
Summary: A verbal update of the meetings will be given.
Attachments: none
•
• Agenda Item 6B
•
•
Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Topic: Environmental Board Goals /2001 to 2003
Summary: Attached are the goals adopted by the Environmental Board for 2001. I
suggest evaluation of these goals as starting point to discussing goals for 2002/2003.
As a historical record, the Environmental Board adopted these goals in June of 2001.
Because of the lack of effective time at Environmental Board meetings, these goals
came out late. Mr. Grochala has suggested the Environmental Board get ahead of
the timing issue by looking at the 2003 goals, since 2002 budget is already fixed. I
think this is a good idea.
Environmental Board Goals 2001
GOAL #1. Educate developers about the benefits of including prairie gardens in
their landscape designs.
Potential Activity – Provide developers with the opportunity to see examples of
blooming prairie gardens and to talk with the people who "maintain" them.
GOAL #2. Increase citizen understanding and appreciation of Lino Lakes' unique
environmental qualities.
Potential Activities — create a web site
Pilot Restoration Project
Update Environmental Board Packet
Encourage landscaping companies to advertise in city
Investigate possibility of using the "City Wagon"
Work with Homeowners Associations to educate and implement sound
conservation practices.
GOAL #3. Identify, and pursue preservation of, unique environmental assets of
the city.
Potential Activity -- Promote the preservation of the property located on the north
side of Lino Lakes Elementary.
GOAL #4. Restructure monthly meetings to preserve 50% (one hour) of the
meeting to advance our proactive goals.
Potential Activity— assign responsibilities (e.g., tree preservation, buffers) to
individual board members
GOAL #5. Increase communication with analogous units in other metro -area
cities to avoid "re- inventing the wheel" and to look for collaborative opportunities.
Potential Activity — develop a list of cities that have groups focused on the
environment
Host a social event that brings these groups together to share ideas, goals, and
experiences.
GOAL #6. Investigate and promote the possibility of developing a conservation
development ordinance for the city.
Potential Activity —get examples of such ordinances from other cities.
GOAL #7. Develop and implement a strategy to obtain more resources (staff and
financial) to enable the city to establish itself as the leader in the metro area
in terms of development, that is both economically and environmentally
intelligent.
GOAL #8. Communicate more regularly, and more directly, with City Council.
GOAL #9. Assist the City Council with the Comp Plan
Attachments: None
•
•
• Agenda Item 6C
•
•
Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Topic: Earth Day
Summary: Earth Day is scheduled for April 20, 2002. This is the 14th year that the
City has sponsored an Earth Day Celebration. For the last several years the City of
Lino Lakes has worked together with the Cities of Lexington, Circle Pines and
Centerville in what has become the Quad Cities Earth Day Celebration.
There has been one meeting to date from the Organizational Committee. The next
meeting is scheduled for March 12, 6:00 PM at Circle Pines City Hall. The theme this
year is 'What's in Your Back Yard ? ". We are looking for issues that focus on
environmental issues that can be looked at on a back yard focus. For instance,
people often times might see Egrets or Herons in the lakes or ponds on or around
their properties. We know that residents for the most part see the birds but do not
have an understanding of habitat, or the unique resources that people have in their
back yards. One idea is to have small prairie - starter kits that folks can take home
with them to start a small native planting in their back yards.
One big coordination issue that I need help with is volunteers. I need someone that
has intemet that can take calls and coordinate with me on projects scheduling and
phone calling. I do have some projects in mind besides the usual cleanup types of
activities. We have two restoration projects lined up for this spring. The city could
prepare the sites and have volunteers seed the areas.
I think the Environmental Board should focus on the education thing of backyards,
especially with the Herons. Anoka County is gathering some "touch and feel" things.
I have talked to Jeff Perry from Anoka County about tying in the local education issue
with our Environmental Board. Please come with Ideas.
Attachments: None
• Agenda Item 6D
Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Topic: City Newsletter
Summary: At the request of the Environmental Board at the January meeting,
this item is included for discussion.
Attachments:
1. City of Lino Lakes Quarterly Newsletter Time Line
City of Lino Lakes
Quarterly Newsletter Time Line
Quarter Months Covered
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
January 02
J:\dtesch\Newsletter22002 Timeline.doc
•
Deadlines and Dates
Staff Article Prep
To Deb C. for layout
To the printer
In mail boxes
Staff Article Prep
To Deb C. for layout
To the printer
In mail boxes
Staff Article Prep
To Deb C. for layout
To the printer
In mail boxes
Staff Article Prep
To Deb C. for layout
To the printer
In mail boxes
1 October
15 October
15 November
Last weekend in November
1 January
15 January
15 February
Last weekend in February
1 April
15 April
15 May
Last weekend in May
1 July
15 July
15 August
Last weekend in August
• Agenda Item 6E
Environmental Board Meeting Date: February 27, 2002
Topic: Environmental Board Ordinance and Job Description
Summary: This item was added to the agenda at the January meeting, but was
tabled due to lack of time.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance No. 04 -98
2. Environmental Board Job Description
•
•
•
•
Council Member
adoption:
introduced the following ordinance and moved its
CITY OF LINO LAKES
COUNTY OF ANOKA
ORDINANCE NO. 04-98
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD,
CHAPTER 217 OF THE LINO LAKES CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Lino Lakes hereby ordains as follows:
Chapter 217, Environmental Board is hereby established as follows:
217. Environmental Board
217.01 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide aid and advice
to the council in its efforts to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between people
and their environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the
environment and stimulate the health and welfare of people; to enrich the understanding of
the ecological systems and natural resources important to the city; to advise the City in the
use and management of its natural resources in order to preserve and enhance the
environmental amenities for present and future residents, and to improve and insure a
lasting quality of life within the city.
217.02 Establishment. The Lino Lakes Board on Environment,
hereinafter referred to as the Board, is hereby established. The Board shall operate in
accordance with Chapter 210.
Membership of the Environmental Board shall consist of seven (7) members who shall be
appointed by the Mayor with City Council approval, for three (3) year terms commencing
on January 1st. Terms shall be staggered so that no more than one -half of the members'
terms expire at one time. Both the original and successive appointee shall hold their
respective offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. Vacancies during the
term shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointments are made for the
unexpired portion of the term vacated. Every appointed member shall before entering
upon the discharge of his duties, have taken an oath that he will faithfully discharge the
duties of his office.
Page 1
•
217.03 Duties. The Board shall:
(1) Oversee a Natural Resource inventory and management plan and
create a database to be used to make land use recommendations that:
1. Preserve important natural and cultural sites.
2. Provide greenways and corridors connecting natural areas and
other points of interest.
3. Preserve and enhance wildlife habitat.
4. Preserve and enhance water conveyances, water quality, and
wetland habitat
5. Preserve and establish a healthy urban forest.
6. Promote bio- diversity
(2) Review land use and development proposals, for compliance with
the natural resource regulations, ordinances, and landscaping and
forestry needs, and make recommendations for improvements and
the mitigation of environmental impacts.
(3) Cooperate with other municipalities, counties, state agencies and
watershed groups on matters of environmental issues.
(4) Provide for environmental community education programs.
(5) Submit grant proposals to raise money for projects.
(6) Serve as a resource to other City advisory boards.
(7) Hold public meetings to address environmental issues.
(8) Develop and recommend to the council policies, ordinances, and
procedures for the management, of natural resources and
conservation development.
(9)
Make recommendations on the planning, development, maintenance,
and budget needs of natural, native, forest, and botanical
improvement projects that are consistent with the Environmental
Management Plan; and recommend a budget for materials, human
resources, and equipment to provide for support of these functions.
Page 2
•
•
(10) Make recommendations on land acquisition for greenways, and other
important natural areas consistent with the Environmental
Management Plan.
(11) Gather information concerning the conditions and trends in the
quality of the environment, both current and prospective, with the
purpose of determining whether or not such conditions and trends
are likely to interfere with the goals of the city.
(12) Report not less than once each year to the council on the state and
condition of the environment in the city, and on the work of the
commission.
(13) Make and furnish such studies or reports thereon, and
recommendations with respect to matters of policy and legislation as
the council may request.
(14) Act as liaison between the council and people or organizations which
may wish to develop, and care for natural areas and projects that
enhance the natural character of public lands, or donate personnel,
moneys or equipment for the enhancement of the city natural
resources.
(15) Work with the county on the management of County Park space
within the city and county.
(16) Make recommendations to the City Council on issues concerning
solid waste and recycling.
217.04 Compensation of Members. Members shall receive a quarterly salary of
$150.00 ($50.00 per meeting) with the chair of the Board to receive $225.00 per quarter
($75.00 per meeting).
This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication according to the City
Charter.
Passed by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes, this day of , 1998.
ATTEST:
Page 3
Kimberly A. Sullivan, Mayor
•
•
•
Marilyn G. Anderson, Clerk- Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing ordinance was duly seconded by Council
Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor:
The following voted against same:
Whereupon said ordinance was declared duly passed and adopted.
Page 4
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD JOB DESCRIPTION
Primary Objective of Position
The role of the Environmental board is to advise City Council and city staff in the use
and management of it's natural resources in order to preserve, enhance, and restore the
environmental amenities for present and future generations.
This seven member advisory board is established by Lino lakes City Code - Chapter 217.
Members are appointed by the City Council to serve staggered three -year terms. The
Environmental Board meets the last Wednesday of each month in the Lino Lakes City
Council Chambers. Compensation is $150.00 per quarter for board members and
$225.00 per quarter for the chairperson.
Essential Job Functions (this is almost verbatim from the "duties" section of the
ordinance)
1. Oversee the development and application of a natural resources inventory,
environmental databases, and an environmental management plan that seeks to:
a. Preserve important natural and cultural sites.
b. Provide greenways and corridors connecting natural areas and other points of
interest.
c. Preserve and enhance wildlife habitat.
d. Preserve and enhance water conveyances, water quality, and wetland habitat.
e. Preserve and establish a healthy urban forest.
f. Promote biodiversity.
2. Review land use and development proposals for compliance with natural resource
regulations and ordinances. Make recommendations on landscaping and forestry
needs and for environmental improvements and the mitigation of environmental
impacts and integrate conservation development principals in all types of
development.
3. Cooperate with other municipalities, counties, state agencies, and watershed groups
on matters of environmental issues.
4. Provide for environmental community education programs.
5. Submit grant proposals to raise money for environmental projects.
6. Serve as a resource to other City advisory boards.
7. Hold public meetings to address environmental issues.
8. Develop and recommend to the council policies, ordinances, and procedure for the
preservation and management of natural resources.
9. Make recommendations on the planning, development, maintenance, and budget
needs of natural resource projects that are consistent with the environmental
management plan. Recommend a budget for materials, human resources and
equipment to provide for support of these functions.
10. Make recommendations on land acquisition for greenways and other important
natural areas consistent with the environmental management plan.
•
•
11. Gather information concerning the condition and trends in the quality of the
environment, both current and prospective, with the purpose of determining whether
or not such conditions and trends are likely to interfere with the goals of the City.
12. Report not less than once each year to the council on the state and condition of the
environment in the city and on the work of the board.
13. Make and furnish such studies or reports thereon and recommendations with respect
to matters of policy and legislation as the council may request.
14. Act as liaison between the council and people or organizations that wish to carry out
natural resource enhancement projects.
15. Work with the county on the management of County Park space within the city.
16. Make recommendations to the City Council on issues concerning solid waste and
recycling.
Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities
1. Ability to read and understand maps and technical reports.
2. Knowledge of City policies and ordinance related to environmental issues.
3. Ability to communicate clearly and tactfully with fellow board members and the
public.
4. Knowledge of budget and financing principals.
Required Qualifications
1. Resident of Lino Lakes.
2. Availability to attend regularly scheduled meetings of the Environmental Board.
Desired Qualifications
1 Education or training in environmentally related disciplines such as environmental
planning, water management, wildlife habitat, plant communities, soils, or other
areas.
2. Excellent written and verbal communication skills.
3. Previous work or volunteer experience on environmental projects.
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : December 19, 2001
TIME STARTED : 6:35 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 9:29 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Amy Donlin, Constance Grundhofer, Rod Kukonen,
Theresa O'Connell, and Mike Trehus (arrived at 7:48
p.m.).
MEMBERS ABSENT : None.
Staff members present: Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, and Community
Development Director Michael Grochala.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Kukonen called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. November 28, 2001
Donlin moved to suspend approval of the S d November meeting minutes.
Grundhofer seconded the motion. M
3. APPROVAL OF AGEND
The following item was a w , -- * e meeting agenda:
• Discuss new member $ come etter.
The agenda was ap imously.
4. OPEN MIKE
No citizen comments were made.
5. ACTION ITEMS
animously.
A. Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition — Asleson introduced the developer, Mr.
Vaughan, and the civil engineer, Mr. Shopek. He encouraged the Environmental
Board to focus their attention on the environmental issues. Staff reviewed the
background material. The developer intended to build seven lots on Wards Lake
Island connecting them to the Quail Ridge Development via a bridge to connect the
northern end of Ruffed Grouse Road. Since the review in September, a different
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
grading plan/preliminary plat was submitted. The first plan should not have been
reviewed. Two lots in the southeast would require fill in the new plan. Two items
not included in the plan are the DNR ordinary high water line (OHW), and future soil
disturbance issues within the "Tree Preservation Limits." Staff stated that the site
was located in a Lake Protection Zone where no suggested development should
occur, and a High Ecological Zone where protection strategies should be used to
protect the surrounding resources. These zones are defined in the Lino Lakes
Environmental Management Plan. The island is land cover classified as a recently
developed forest in the Lino Lakes Environmental Management Plan. This
classification does exist on the outside perimeter of the island. The upland portions
of the island are however covered with older growth burr and white oak, ash,
hackberry, and northern black cherry. The island is surrounded by cattail marsh and
shrub thicket. The island was surrounded by a PSS 1/EM Cd wetland. Wards Lake is
public waters and is situated in a Natural Environment Basin. Wa
directions flow into Wards Lake and then go into Reshanau L
the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park is static. Water holdin
thus also limited. There was a discussion about a 200 fo
the island. The buffer recommendation is suggested i
Handbook. There was a discussion of surface wat
hydraulic pulsing. It was suggested that the develop
described in the Barr Engineering/Met Counc
same Barr Engineering/Met Council guid- ;•
volume evacuation, and pollution reduc
a discussion of the need for the ponds t
was I discussion of the northern
be moved to the South side of
the East Side of the island s
There was a discussion o
that lots should be des• s -
guidelines for this . r
Guidelines. There w .�.,
on the island .s the
Tree Ordinanc
that a five -year
management plan
from all
asin area of
the basin is
endation on
s Environmental
and trying to reduce
use iques such as those
es. It was suggested that the
oul used to reduce surface water
11 as for site protection. There was
d for infiltration reasons. There
It was stated that the swale should
ere was a discussion of lot reduction on
al infiltration area might be designed.
ng € €,+ ses as an alternative design. It was suggested
on -lot infiltration as much as possible. Suggested
ed in the Barr Engineering/Met Council
discussion about the not yet defined soil disturbance areas
proposal. A tree inventory is required according to the
discussion of the need to plant natural vegetation, and
ag ment plan would need to be submitted. A protection and
ould be developed for all tree, natural vegetation, infiltration, and
water areas. There was discussion about the desire to develop a natural environment
information sheet for all new residents moving on to the island. The need to regulate
the use of buffer and protection areas was discussed.
Staff recommendations followed:
1. Redesign Surface Water Plan. Use techniques such as are suggested in the Barr
Engineering BMP Manual. Reduce hydraulic spiking and increase infiltration in
ponding situations. Use infiltration/ponding design in areas where they would be
effective and non - polluting. Ponds 1 and 2 do not work as designed.
2. Reduce lots /or cluster houses. Use rest of the Island for surface water treatment
including buffering.
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
3. Move the swale idea to the South side of the Island. Incorporate rainpond idea
into treatment train along proposed road to flow water to the infiltration area on
East end of the Island.
4. Produce Tree Inventory. Needed for planning.
5. Replace trees lost in areas of disturbance.
6. Restore all areas disturbed for road/bridge and surface water treatment/infiltration
areas with native tree shrub and ground story vegetation. Materials replaced to be
determined by the tree inventory, and species list specified by the City. Site
should be restored to pre - disturbance vegetation densities.
7. Incorporate on -lot filtration practices such as are described in Barr Engineering
BMP Manual.
8. Use BMP's for sequencing such as are described in the Barr Engineering BMP
Manual. Develop a management plan. Plan should include protection measures
for trees, vegetation, swale and infiltration areas, and erosion c. i trol measures.
9. Submit a three to 5 -year management plan that uses the se ► ces • a company
experienced in native plant re- establishment. Show fin. -- co tment for this
management.
10. Initiate covenants with homeowner association fo p cio` of vegetation,
and the prohibiting of vegetation removal.
11. Place areas of the Island in land trust as an tern: 'vet enants.
12. Develop an education program for new re °'° + +ving onto the Island.
Brochure information at the least sho •eve . '• • describing vegetation
management.
Donlin thanked staff for the thoro
the 100 -year storm elevation.
and Zoning Board.
acket, and expressed concern over
'ndic.ted that was a question for the Planning
Donlin stated that she . - heasant Hills was a supreme development, and there
have been steps t - • `ep i ural, but this development addition appeared to be
a departure from the oper's previous work. There were four issues with the plan
she had conce r : . bout. t, it was located in a lake protection zone. Second, it
was located in : R ogical zone and needed a 200 -foot buffer according to the
Environmental db + ok. Third, the surface water and any pollutants would reach
the groundwater 1 ours to minutes. Fourth, the entire Island would be graded. She
indicated that she could not see the plan going forward because it was contrary to the
spirit of every ordinance.
Kukonen inquired about the red flags or markings on the property when he visited the
site in September. Mr. Vaughan responded it marked off the property in the
northwestern portion that was County property and would not be developed.
Asleson stated he needed to know the locations of the proposed ponds.
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
Mr. Vaughan indicated he had a court settlement stating that the land could be
developed and the City should help him. He assured the Board that he would save as
many trees as possible.
Asleson explained that Mr. Vaughan had been fun to work with in tree preservation,
but Phase 1 -11 was different from the 12th Addition. Mr. Vaughan answered that the
lot prices alone would be $200,000. Originally there were eight lots, but the number
had been reduced.
Mr. Shopek stated that the City application required a complete design to submit to
the Watershed District. He indicated the stormwater issues were satisfied according
to the Watershed District. The project had the permit from the DNR to build the
bridge, which would go from upland to upland so that no wetlands would be
destroyed. It was intended to be a preliminary plan. He had work
Vaughan since 1991 and assured the Board tree preservation
There was a discussion of Rice Creek Watershed reviews
reviews. Mr. Shopek went on to explain Pheasant Hills
Shopek discussed houses, garages and driveways wer
Shopek discussed legally binding covenant require
the homeowner, and would cover tree preservat.
with Mr.
priority.
nmental
sign. Mr.
the plan. Mr.
d be required of
n, f. ilize' d pesticide use
Grundhofer inquired about the width of t r er.
Kukonen asked about the ordinary high
was the ordinary high water level
elevation of 880.3 feet, Peters
were not touching the norm
1, and if the solid line on the map
S sponded the DNR required an
tal did the wetland delineation, and they
els.
Donlin inquired if the sewered. Mr. Shopek indicated that they were.
Donlin stated the bu as 150 feet, but because of the status of a high ecological
zone it was p - . back more. She indicated the ordinances must be
maintained. S ' essed concern over the pond elevations being located so
close to the wate abl . Donlin stated the need for caution in designing surface water
plans in this area.
Mr. Shopek discussed the proposed NURP ponds and stated the design as standard
practice.
Mr. Vaughan showed his concern for wetlands by noting that Phase 8 had been
delayed because of his reluctance to remove cattails.
Donlin explained that setting a precedent concerned her. She indicated the Board
needed to do anything it could to minimize the pollutants entering the groundwater.
She acknowledged Mr. Vaughan attempted to be sensitive to environmental issues,
evidenced by former Chair Scott Lanyon choice to live in that development.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
Mr. Shopek submitted that they were willing to have a joint meeting to discuss
options between the City and the Watershed District, and possibly change the
standard. He pointed out the developer's willingness to modify the plan to meet all of
the requirements.
Grochala stated if the moratorium ordinance was approved by the City Council, it
would be effective February 21, 2001.
Mr. Vaughan stated the plan would be reviewed at the Planning and Zoning Board
meeting of January 12, 2001. The Council would have one month then to vote on the
project.
Grundhofer inquired how much vegetation would be removed. M hopek
responded that about 50% of the vegetation would be remove . 20% for
infrastructure.
Mr. Shopek noted there would be a three -foot ditc
swail, and instead of ponds have infiltration bas
would be left for the house if the houses were
o decrease the
n stated only 10%
ep and 70 -foot long.
Asleson discussed the possibilities for e Re ation in this area.
Donlin asked for clarification if s
indicated that the lake was act
previous sedimentation that
island may be beneficial.
at something like this.
ng filling the lake. Asleson
pond as it exists, and that removing
or shoreland buffer enhancement on the
a feasibility study would be needed to look
Donlin inquired abou ?'` five -inch difference from the 100 -year flood level that
Trehus noted. Shop swered that Wards Lake had never bounced five feet,
and they were t eve that It was five feet, not five inches. Older homes did
not have those r ire ents, and have not been affected.
Kukonen expressed concern that water on the bridge would end up in the pond. Mr.
Shopek indicated that it would.
Kukonen asked what was catching the water on the opposite side of the bridge. Mr.
Shopek responded the water would go into the existing storm sewer in Quail Ridge.
Asleson stated that he was comfortable working with tree preservation. The critical
issue was the surface water treatment, which included the backyards. Mr. Shopek
pointed out it could be done with covenants.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
Grundhofer inquired about swimming pools if they were allowed. Mr. Vaughan
stated he did not think so.
Asleson explained it would be important to design the lots so that the water would not
go into the next door neighbor's basement. Mr. Shopek responded that they would do
that when they knew what the house looked like.
Kukonen noted that there would be a request for a Shoreline Ordinance variance and
asked if there was any way to avoid it. Mr. Shopek answered that it would give just
30 feet down the middle with which to build.
Mr. Vaughan stated that he needed some kind of answer tonight, such as conditional
approval.
O'Connell inquired if road salting was going to be hauled off
Trehus arrived at 7:48 p.m.
O'Connell asked if it would be possible to have p
walk home.
Mr. Vaughan indicated that he wanted to
had put forth. He suggested that on ite
and the Watershed District. He would
address items 9 -12 with a residen
feasible. Mr. Vaughan stated
e of the Island and
he recommendations staff
d 8, they would work with staff
sleson on items 4 and 5. He could
t item 2 was not economically
planned to do item 6.
Trehus stated that the v .: "° `ten `' ` ould be established. Kukonen agreed.
Grundhofer asked • 'his ion on the plan. Asleson responded it was going
in the right direction use they were listening to recommendations. He pointed
out that the Ci . +eeded ree inventory.
Mr. Vaughan su i, 'tte that his approach was to take the path of least variances.
Asleson advised they needed to keep as much water on site as possible.
Donlin stated she needed to respectfully abstain from the vote because it was in a
Lake Protection Zone, the variance issue, and the sensitivity of the northwestern
portion of the Island. She held that some areas should not be developed.
Trehus concurred and echoed her statement. He agreed some areas should not be
developed. There were too many areas of concern and it did not fit into the model of
development adopted by the City economically, culturally, or environmentally. Mr.
Vaughan corrected that it worked economically. The Island was 3.5 to 4 acres, with
three- fourths of an acre lots.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
Kukonen indicated the concerns needed a recommendation. He inquired about the
possibility of purchasing the property.
Grundhofer asked if anything could be passed on if only three members were voting.
Grochala stated the Board needed to recommend approval or not recommend
approval. He noted there were many legal issues and while Staff recommendations
would enhance the plan, recommendations from the Board should be included.
Councilmember Donna Carlson noted to abstain from a vote would be counted as a
no vote.
Asleson urged the Board to add qualifying statements to the reco si endation.
Kukonen submitted that residents might be interested in a tr i stem, a`° d could seek
funding. Trehus added that residents could band togethe o assn o rchase the
site. Mr. Vaughan answered that the homeowner due re hie . ugh so there
would be no support for it.
Kukonen asked for a motion.
Grundhofer made a motion not to reco end °; : oval as it is now. Donlin added
five reasons for not recommending app
• It is in a Lake Protection Zo
• The site is in a high ecol•: a zone where "no development should occur,"
according to the Env ' dbook and Shoreline Management.
• A high ecological z• requires a 200 -foot buffer from it.
• The West end is : a to sundwater contamination, going from minutes to
hours to the water
• The catch b the est side should be met with a high level of scrutiny.
O'Connell adde. ,f the plan moves forward, all the recommendations submitted by
staff must be foll ed. Staff should be involved with the Rice Creek Watershed
District and the developers in dealing with future stormwater management issues.
O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
6. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. NEMO /GTS — This item was discussed later in the meeting.
B. Peltier Island/Ordinance Update — This item was discussed later in the meeting.
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
C. WUI/Fire Risk Assessment — Mr. Bennett announced the assessment of fire prone
areas was finished and high -risk concerns centered on four areas. Evergreen Trail
was the highest risk area because the houses were set into the trees. Mr. Bennett
stated he was going to work with the residents to try to retain the landscape
atmosphere but increase safety. If a grant could be obtained, he would host meetings
and discuss trimming trees and removing the surrounding underbrush to prevent fire
from topping the trees. He needed to see if the grant money could come through.
Asleson explained that there were pathological issues that affect the integrity of the
pine stands and add to fire risk.
Mr. Bennett stated the Andover fire and the Carlos Avery fire had given substance to
the need for both the ecological and defensible issues. There was no escape route on
Evergreen Trail, and he would not put the lives of the firefighters . the line for a
house.
Trehus inquired about the need for fire hydrants located
defensible. Mr. Bennett responded that they tank the'
need to inform people of the issues, that he was try
had to be within 150 feet from the structure, wh'. h is
pines were the highest risk in dry seasons, ho
have fire top them.
ake it
e reiterated the
agedy. By law he
He added that the
leaves left on them can
A. NEMO /GTS — Grochala stated a d Zoning public hearing approval
was recommended, with a 3 -2 . . . ro e.
Kukonen asked about th
answered the second r
Charter. Usually o
with preliminary plat
the City contr
that do not nee
common interes
permits still woul
g o first and second readings. Grochala
d to take place at least 14 days later by the City
changes. It would not apply to the developments
oval. The City's reason for exempting the Village was that
land. Other exemptions included minor subdivisions
ose subdivisions of four lots or less, plats with 4 -plex, and
plats that break into separately owned residences. Building
ontinue.
The number of lots not affected by the moratorium would be about 400, however they
would be built at different times because there is a lag time between approval and
construction. During the moratorium, the Council and the Planning and Zoning
Board will be working on the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. There was a strong
desire to not extend the moratorium. To attempt a complete overhaul on both is an
aggressive schedule, and they will not be revisiting the Comprehensive Plan. A task
force was being established with equal representation from each of the Boards, and an
Advisory Committee with O'Donnell from the City Council chairing it. He was
going to set ground rules, and agree to disagree, but to move forward. If a board
member impedes progress, there is the possibility of removal. Staff would be
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
facilitating the meetings. All the work would need to be done in about ten months.
Each Board would choose the members for the task force.
Kukonen inquired about the possibility of alternates if someone was unable to attend.
Grochala responded that he was trying to build continuity and consensus. He would
be returning to the Board in January. A land use workshop would be held and
Council is strongly urging attendance. NEMO would be making a presentation in the
beginning on January 26, 2002, food would be provided, and the workshop would run
from about 8:30 a.m.- 3:30 or 4:00 p.m. The task force would probably begin in
February.
Kukonen asked who would be conducting the workshop. Grochala answered he was
unsure who would conduct the workshop.
Trehus inquired if the Conservation Handbook on geenways ; oming into
play. Grochala stated it would play a big part in setting up t siden ,,;al PDO. The
greenways would be in the Subdivision part. He attemp i o br- o " the policies
in the areas of the Environmental Board, the greenwa Board.
Trehus stated the suitable land use for greenwa wou be ; ° ', and the City should
attempt to correlate it with the buffers. He n e - u- mo . ated April 11, 2001 had
useful information to incorporate, or to us oint.
Grochala indicated it would be benefici
rules, the project would probably
the past.
a developer follows a given list of
d. It would avoid the conflicts of
Trehus noted the most i con in the Handbook was the three intersecting
circles.
Kukonen asked if tho onducfing the workshop knew that a goal was to establish a
Conservation " ; . divisio dinance. Grochala assured the Board that they knew.
Donlin expresse'' on `= rn over the two numbers in the Comprehensive Plan, 147 new
households /year .;< rage, and a 20,500 population cap assuming 2.5
people/household. Grochala answered that household sizes could fluctuate over the
20 year planning period.
Donlin reiterated that the two numbers meant everything.
Grochala noted that Pheasant Hills was the only development that could be approved
if the moratorium went through. January 14, 2002 was the deadline to be heard by
the Planning and Zoning Board in February, and go to Council in March. The
Moratorium will probably cover only residential developments. The Metropolitan
Council had not signed off the Comprehensive Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
• Kukonen asked if the number was an average rather than a cap. Grochala answered
that for the Village alone there would be 300 units.
•
•
Kukonen noted an article in the Friday edition of the Pioneer Press that ranked Lino
Lakes 11`}' highest, Centerville was 2nd highest and Circle Pines 13th highest for tax
rates based on a $130,000 home. He believed it was due to the Centennial Schools.
Grochala stated that Lino Lakes was a large city, and one of the goals of the
Comprehensive Plan was to broaden the tax base.
Trehus indicated the Pioneer Press probably obtained the information from the
League of Cities.
Donlin asked if the meetings were going to be held in the evenin
per month. Grochala indicated extra meetings would probabl
get behind schedule.
Donlin inquired if the Park Board would be involved.
Board was occupied with park improvement refere
as a resource for the task force.
B. Peltier Island/Ordinance Update — Asle
expressed interest in a January meeting
signage indicating no water skiing.
ith one meeting
uled if they
nded the Park
d only be involved
ted t esidents of the area
nal park concerning posting
Donlin mentioned her father h invitation to attend January 9, 2002.
Grundhofer inquired if it ect by spring. Asleson responded that was
the goal.
Donlin asked if Wa `?= Blanc was to be involved. Asleson answered he was.
Asleson stated an Interface Inventory was completed. He believed it
would redefine at s ould be protected. In many cases, the previous inventory
matches up with t Y - new one but the updated inventory was more defined. Rare
species were found. He thinks it was sound data to move on. By Tom Johnson's
home there was found a unique high quality poor fen sedge subtype. It was also
found on Roundeau Island in Roundeau Lake. There were also native grasses found
off Genie Drive. Asleson stated he was one of five people who had seen a certain
plant with small fruiting structures on the stem. It needed to be classified and there
should be an attempt to preserve them. The rest of the City would be classified next
year.
Trehus inquired who was applying for the grants. Asleson stated that he and the
Watershed District applied for the grant for land classification. The impetus was to
bring the land classification into a standardized statewide system.
10
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 19, 2001
Grundhofer asked if the Board could view the land classification on the computer.
Staff responded that it could be arranged.
D. New Member Welcome Letter — Kukonen posed the question if a letter stating the
Board's goals and direction would be appropriate. He urged the Board to forward
any ideas on the subject.
7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. Forestry — Donlin inquired the reason for the same species of oaks to hold their
leaves at varying times. Asleson responded it was a matter of genetics.
B. Solid Waste Recycling — This item was tabled to the January 30,
8. ADJOURN
2 meeting.
It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental : d � ` January 30,
2002.
There being no further business, Trehus moved t .m. Donlin seconded
the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Brigette Blesi
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, In
11
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : September 26, 2001
TIME STARTED : 6:35 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 8:40 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Constance Grunhofer, Rod Kukonen, Theresa
O'Connell, and Mike Trehus.
MEMBERS ABSENT : Amy Donlin.
Staff members present: Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, Community Development
Director Michael Grochala.
CALL TO ORDER
Acting Chair Kukonen presided and called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. June 27, 2001— The following corrections were requ
Page 9, second paragraph: "Kukonen mentioned tha
developers he was in favor of a moratori on res
want to inhibit the Economic Development De
ial development, but did not
including businesses."
B. August 26, 2001— The following co a s we requested:
Page 6, twelfth paragraph: "Trees ;,_ • • asked about the vacated 77th
Street."
Trehus moved to approve the Au 6, 2001 meeting minutes as amended above.
Grundhofer seconded the motion. '''''' otion carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The following items were added to the meeting agenda:
• Discuss Update on Molin Concrete under Project Update 8D.
• Discuss Quarterly stipend.
The agenda was approved as amended above.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
No citizen comments were made.
1
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
• PROJECT REVIEW
•
•
A. Appointment of New Chair — The Board discussed the positions of Chair and Vice
Chair. Trehus nominated Kukonen for Chair of the Board. O'Connell seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously. Grundhofer nominated Trehus for Vice Chair.
Kukonen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Market Place Update — Grochala stated that due to the legislature lowering the required
votes to pass a motion, the Ryan/Target Market Place project is active again. There were
actions discussing subsidies and Lake Drive traffic issues, as well as Wetland
replacement.
Grundhofer inquired about the wetland mitigation at the golf course, did it have a buffer
zone and would it be affected. Asleson indicated that he had not seen anything, but
would obtain a copy of the plans and check on it.
0' Connell stated that at the present time there were no buffers.
Grundhofer asked if a buffer was required. Grochala nded that it was in the
jurisdiction of the Rice Creek Watershed District.
Trehus inquired about the PDO, was it three or • •otes. Grochala answered that it was
three votes, and was reviewed and suppo .- . by se ,.overnment agencies. He
continued that the issues Asleson worked • Q arget were based on the best
management practices and maintenance con ` in _ catch basins to reduce phosphorus
loading. The intention of the Cit o put 4 s filtration operation and maintenance best
practices in the agreement to lo
Asleson mentioned the o
that the on site would incr
n would reduce the phosphorus the same amount
Trehus questioned the issue of ax abatement for the project. Grochala responded that tax
abatement was linked with business subsidies of $519,000 from on site, while the
existing taxes on the site total $22,000 annually. If the estimated 5 -year at $500,000
would be exceeded, the amount of time could be reduced for the tax abatement.
C. Raske Building Systems, Apollo Business Center, Minor Subdivision, Site Plan
Review — Asleson reviewed the background that the site was one of two buildable sites
left in the Apollo Business District, and the area was zoned Light Industrial. The main
environmental issue had been surface water, however it was noted that an isolated
artificial pond was adequate to deal with the surface runoff from the two sites. One
concern was that a mixed hardwood stand in the west might be affected by the drainage
swails. He identified the options to recommend denial, or to recommend approval with
the standard staff and any added Board recommendations. The use of natural vegetation
in the drainage and swail areas with a transitional area including a possible flower
garden. A flower garden could also be added in the northwest corner. A change in the
2
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
trees near the freeway to Oak species was recommended, or if pines were needed
Austrian Pine should be used with mulch to separate from the native plantings. A
contract to install the plantings with a company specializing in native landscape
construction needed to be submitted. A three -year maintenance agreement with a
landscape company specializing in native plantings needed to be submitted. Finally the
use of low impact lighting would be recommended.
Chair Kukonen inquired about the possibility of another proposed site between the two
sites. Grundhofer responded that the whole four acres would be developed.
Asleson suggested that the red cedars could be moved around because they were small.
Chair Kukonen indicated that the pond had sand on the open end and the water was clean.
O'Connell questioned whether the six acres included the pond. She recommended that a
tree inventory be submitted, because the road to the site included Northern Black
Cherries, ash, and several others.
Trehus posed the question of where the swails were
flowed through there. Asleson answered that the s
a need to increase the infiltration rates on the i
and asked how much water
o impervious, and there was
Chair Kukonen inquired if the planned 55 king were the maximum allowed,
and whether it could be reduced. Asleson „�-d at it could be reduced to the
minimum.
Trehus asked if there was a pos i4 R been islands in the middle of the parking lot.
Asleson explained that it co r ended if feasible.
Grundhofer clarified that
option to buy. She inquired
Asleson indicated that the co
use would be leased to another company with the
er the company produced or stored cleaning supplies.
any was a distributor.
Grundhofer addressed the issue of spillage of any kind. Asleson pointed out that OSHA
and MPCA standards regulated chemical use and clean up, while the Department of
Agriculture monitored pesticide use.
Grundhofer addressed the recently developed hardwood trees, would the water impact the
trees. Asleson indicated that grading would remove the trees.
Chair Kukonen reviewed the recommendations to be attached to option 1.
• The use of low impact lighting focused down to the ground with no spill.
• Attempt to decrease the number of parking spaces to the minimum possible.
Grundhofer added another recommendation:
• A tree preservation plan should be submitted.
3
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
O'Connell made a motion for option 1 to recommend approval with recommendations
from the staff and the Board. Grundhofer seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. Pheasant Hills Preserve 12th Addition, Preliminary Plat/PDO, Comp Plan
Amendment — MUSA — Asleson stated that this was a formal application with a
preliminary plat as a planned development overlay, and he reviewed the background.
The site would be on an island on Wards Lake which was public water. A bridge would
be constructed for access and has already been granted a permit with stormwater outfalls
by the DNR. The DNR stated that the permit did not mean support for the project. The
site was under the Shoreline Ordinance with a setback of 150 feet for any building, while
the shore impact zone was 75 feet from the shore where no vegetation was allowed to be
removed. The plan showed the entire island would be graded, and all vegetation be
removed. The areas to the north and west and toward the south were very sensitive to
aquifer contamination. Additionally, the entire area was on the 100 -year floodplain. Two
recommendations of Mr. Hovey of the DNR were to reduce the impervious areas to
maintain the runoff volumes and rates, and to enact covenants for the homeowners.
Finally the Lino Lakes Management Handbook recomm as much buffering as
possible.
Trehus pointed out that there were no maps or s sub ted. Asleson located the
bridge on a City map, and distributed a list of sh • e terms to clarify the comments.
Trehus asked whether water or wetland su island. Asleson reviewed that it
was a sensitive area on a floodplain. The is 1 w a ` just under 1000 feet long. He
indicated that the definition of bl . whe .- here was a 25 -foot change in elevation,
while the island had only a 20- : ; °ich was the largest change in elevation in
that part of the City. On th • e was a periodic tree kill from the water changes,
while the recommended fferin o be on the perimeter.
Chair Kukonen stated that th�� ere several roadblocks to the project, and there was no
Comprehensive Plan to amend. Asleson concurred that the slopes were steep and the
developers would be asking for variances on all the shorelines.
Grundhofer inquired about the possibility of two houses, with no variances.
Chair Kukonen indicated that he had walked the property and recalled that there were
very mature trees that created an oak savanna, and that the wetland flags appeared to be
inaccurate.
Asleson stated that economics were driving the plan. He mentioned the developer tried
to preserve trees.
Chair Kukonen suggested that the City might want to acquire the land to preserve as a
park or open space.
4
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
Grundhofer asked if the owner was the same person as all of Pheasant Hills. Asleson
responded that it was.
Chair Kukonen inquired about the need for variances, and would it necessitate adaptation
of the ordinance to the variances. Asleson responded by reading the Surface Water
Management Ordinance, adding that Mr. Hovey recommended buffers.
O'Connell noted Mr. Hovey's letter to Mr. Smyser concerning the grading plan. It
appeared everyone agreed that it was a disaster. Trehus concurred, noting that a
recommendation to deny could be based on:
• The Shoreline Ordinance.
• The grading of the entire island.
• The island was described as one highly sensitive for aquifer contamination of hours to
minutes range due to the soil types.
Grochala addressed Mr. Hovey's letter to Mr. Smyser stating that the proposal was not
consistent with the building setbacks. He pointed out that ooking at the PDO the intent
would have a cluster with a common area Asleson dis e d stating that it was a
standard cookie cutter approach.
Trehus inquired if the shoreline zone could be 'nt. d fo o to three homes.
Asleson answered that they would still need vari
Grochala noted that a variance was for the
reasonable use of the land.
ations where the ordinance denied a
O'Connell asked if there were sta +ands. Grochala explained that the Shoreline
Overlay was based on state project was not an example of it
Trehus stated that the ordi s generous, and there was no need to allow for a
variance for this project.
Grundhofer made a motion to recommend to City Council deny Pheasant Hills 12th
Addition based on inconsistencies with the shoreline ordinance and statewide standards
for the management of shoreline areas. O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BUSINESS
A. Joint Meeting /City Council — Grochala indicated the meeting would take place on
October 17, 2001, from 7 -9 p.m. in the Community Room.
Grundhofer inquired about the reason for waiting until after the meeting for new
members of the Board. Grochala answered it was because the Council wanted the Board
to come to agreement of the goals and responsibilities of the Board before new members
5
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
came on. In addition, the Council desired to have new members with an environmental
background due to the technical nature of the information the Board dealt with.
B. Wildland Urban Interface Update — Asleson stated the joint project ended in
September, with final reports due at the end of the year. They were not able to
accomplish all their goals, however "where to go from here" was discussed. Project
reports such as the evaluation natural resource guidance checklist and G.I.S. land
classification would be finished at the end of the year. The G.I.S. application of
impervious surfaces could be applied to a build up analysis, or the percent cover of trees,
even the health of the stand. Cooperative efforts between Hugo and Lino Lakes on
Wildfire assessments would continue in conjunction with the DNR. Ordinance revision
would continue with the help of the State.
Chair Kukonen inquired about whether it was too late to assess the area behind the
elementary school, and noted it was not in the original report. Asleson responded that the
land classification assessment was going to be finished by the end of the year, and could
address issues such as the Saddle Club site and the valuable greenway areas much more
accurately than before G.I.S., but their staff was reduce
Trehus questioned the status of the Surface Water
that and the moratorium issues needed to get do
funding.
t Plan. Asleson indicated
ed the personnel and
Trehus indicated that he thought it was sub
copy. Asleson responded that there were is
Conservation Development, and k ne
Shoreline Management Ordin
Trehus inquired whether
Grochala answered that it
Watershed District and to wo
Metropolitan Council concern
e Metropolitan Council, but saw no
incompliance to state law and the
d on it was similar to that of the
ter Management Plan had been submitted.
ut John Powell was attempting to contact Rice Creek
th the Environmental Board. He sent a memo to the
g his intentions. He wanted to begin with the Board and
keep in contact through the process, and hopefully have it finished in three meetings.
C. Xcel Energy/Tree Trust/ "Trade a Tree" Program/Sara Smith — Asleson explained
that there were several areas in the City where tree removal would be desirable. Xcel
Energy needed to trim trees near the high voltage lines, which resulted in unsightly trees,
and some had been trimmed so the trees became unhealthy. He introduced Sara Smith
who was representing the Trade a Tree program.
Ms. Smith distributed general information on the program and pointed out that the
program was a part of Tree Trust, a nationally recognized non - profit organization. She
identified the locations in the City which were eligible for the program, and indicated that
the jack pines had been topped on busy roads. The residents would be contacted through
two mailings with a return postcard enclosed, and would be able to choose the species of
tree or shrub, based on several staff choices. The program is flexible and could be
6
•
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
adapted to meet the needs of the City and the residents. The reimbursement was based on
the size of the trunk removed, and there was usually two trees given for each tree
removed. She stated that the trees would be trimmed be Xcel Energy in the near future,
so Tree Trust comes to the cities prior to the trimming to offer the program.
Trehus inquired if Xcel was locked into trimming, and was she thorough in reaching the
residents. Ms. Smith answered that the program would be run through staff.
Trehus asked the number of people who staffed the program. Ms. Smith responded that
she was the only staff member for Trade a Tree program within the Tree Trust.
Chair Kukonen expressed concern about the cost of the stump removal. Ms. Smith
indicated it averaged 50 dollars. She recommended that the money is used for stump
removal or for the planting of the trees, or there would not be enough for the trees.
Chair Kukonen questioned if it was a real cost for the City. Asleson answered that the
City planted trees each spring, and that the planting would not be an added cost, and the
trees would be free with the two for one program.
Grundhofer asked if there would be assistance wit
n of the trees. Ms. Smith
stated that Xcel would be reimbursed for chipp <_ thF ees t `_ .ugh the program.
O'Connell posed the question would the eown - lowed to choose the tree
replacement. Ms. Smith responded that sh e that listed the species the
program would accept. Staff would choose `ut v ve different species that the
homeowner could choose from, �+ e Cit ould choose the species for the
boulevard.
Asleson stated that Xcel ergy de 'to keep the clearances, but was attempting to
change its image.
Trehus asked if the City woul . '`pay for the stump removal. Asleson pointed out that the
stump removal cost was a minor expense.
Grundhofer inquired about any requirements for the location of the replacement trees.
Ms. Smith indicated that the first tree would be at the location of the removed tree, and
would need to be less than 25 feet under the wires, however the second tree could be any
size, and would be given to the City. The program was trying to branch out and has
recently included a mini- arboretum at an elementary school for educational purposes, so
they were trying to meet all the needs.
Trehus asked where the City would be planting the trees. Asleson explained that they
might be put in open spaces, or wherever a tree was needed.
Chair Kukonen called for a motion.
7
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
Grundhofer made a motion to pass on a recommendation to the City Council to
participate in the Trade a Tree program. Trehus seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
D. Project NEMO — Asleson expressed his desire to the Board to bring in the technical
expertise of NEMO into the City as a pilot project.
Trehus inquired about the factors which would increase the chances of this becoming a
reality. Asleson responded that it should be brought up to the City Council.
O'Connell asked about the costs involved. Asleson answered that if the City participated
as a pilot project it would be minimal. He stated that they simplified issues, and used
G.I.S. as a tool and even NASA remote sensing. He also indicated that representatives
from Rice Creek Watershed District were represented.
Chair Kukonen questioned if there was an opportunity to participate. Asleson stated
anyone who had an interest was welcome.
E. Quarterly Stipend — The Board discussed that the st was overdue. Asleson noted
that he would check on it.
PROGRAM /PROJECT UPDATES
A. Solid Waste/Recycling Updates — Asleso e . "'. at October 6, 2001 was the
planned Recycling Day from 9 a.m. 3 p.m st s ed that there was usually a good turn
out with three semi trucks filled .,_ -� � 1 yd ,mpster.
Trehus asked if the City rec
last year the City receive
credit for all their help.
a result of Recycling Day. Asleson stated that
5 for recycling steel. The Lions deserve the
ceeded the tonnage requirements for last year.
B. Forestry — Asleson stated that 8 trees were slated for removal due to oak wilt, but were
still standing because the machine broke down this past summer. The City was
scheduled to have a plough in October to November, but if the ground freezes up before
then, it would not be used. The City plans to plant 200 trees still this fall, with more next
spring. Staff could not keep up with the plantings so it was contracted out. The trees
used were Minnesota Grown. There was a discussion of the boulevard trees.
C. Other Environmental Project Updates — Asleson noted that there were prairie areas
where the Fire Department and the City were planning to burn at the end of next month.
There were three areas where prairie seeding would occur this fall.
D. Molin Concrete Update — Grochala indicated that the recommendation had passed, and
there was a meeting with the residents on the topic. The developers had submitted a
landscaping plan to the City. They were given their TWAFA, or have been approved but
were based on the submission of technical details to be worked out with staff. They were
8
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
addressing the noise generation with the residents. Grochala also found that there were
no new chemicals used on the site, however to prevent environmental impact from
accidental spills, they were enclosing more of their work area.
CLOSE MEETING AND CONFIRM NEXT MEETING DATE
It was noted that the next meeting of the Environmental Board will be on October 24, 2001.
There being no further business, Trehus moved to adjourn at 8:40 p.m. Grundhofer seconded the
motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Brigette Blesi
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
9
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
CITY OF LINO LAKES
MINUTES
DATE : November 28, 2001
TIME STARTED : 6:37 P.M.
TIME ENDED : 9:18 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT : Amy Donlin, Constance Grundhofer, Rod Kukonen,
Theresa O'Connell, and Mike Trehus.
MEMBERS ABSENT : None.
Staff members present: Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson, and City Engineer
John Powell.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Kukonen called the meeting to order at 6:37 p.m.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. October 24, 2001
Trehus moved to approve the October 24, 2 meetin
the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The following items were adde
• Discuss meeting minutes
• Discuss the Pheasant Hills Pre erve 12th Addition Update under 6G.
• Discuss the Lino Lakes Newsletter under 7D.
• Discuss the December meeting date under 7E.
The agenda was approved unanimously.
4. OPEN MIKE
No citizen comments were made.
5. ACTION ITEMS
• A. No new formal applications received.
g agenda:
utes. Grundhofer seconded
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
111 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS
•
•
A. Clearwater Creek 3rd Addition — This item was discussed later in the meeting.
B. Surface Water Management Plan Discussion — Powell distributed and referred
to the Infiltration Checklist from the Rice Creek Watershed District, and a memo
from Richard Thompson. He stated that they were in the process of assembling
information so that they did not have to refer to the project files later. The
Infiltration Checklist is distributed to developers to be completed and address all
points on the checklist. Any inconsistencies between the checklist and present City
policy must be reconciled. There were times that the Watershed had a
requirement, but the City removed it. He noted an example of that was the
Watershed District required raised islands in a cul -de -sac, while the City needed
the streets to accommodate emergency vehicles. Powell stated that both the needs
of the Watershed and the City could be met with smaller islands and lower plants.
Trehus inquired if the items were binding, or were th + elopers required to
address the issues. Powell answered that the deve , were required to address
each issue, and continued with the example; th y w - d 28 -foot street widths,
while the Watershed wanted 26 -foot widths. her• were . sidewalks in the City,
only trails, however the Village could be a pl here sidewalks might be
desired.
Trehus posed the question if a trail was c id d a sidewalk. Powell responded
that a trail was not a sidewalks + con r sidewalks would be a dramatic
change in right -of -way for t
Powell continued to r- %ew th= hs "`` ist. The issues of parking stalls and shared
parking were consisten bot ''the City and Watershed District. Staff noted that
businesses were generally R . sed to overflow parking, shared parking and
parking waivers. The City ~ quired natural vegetation as stated in the Act;
however, no covenants were required as in the Watershed District.
Donlin inquired about the needs for fire, snow removal and storage. Powell
answered that the issue could be resolved with a raised island. However, residents
usually were concerned about the need to see children playing in the street, but he
assured the Board that it was not insurmountable with low plants. If snow would
be piled on the islands the plants would be crushed.
Powell identified in the area of vegetated swales, and noted that education was the
biggest obstacle. In the past the City did not allow swales, and developers wanted
a catch basin. The major issue was the prevention of compaction, so either the
developer could not compact the soil, or must loosen the soil if compaction
occurred. The need for imported soils presents another concern because the
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
compaction would be different with the imported and the native soil. He pointed
out ideally the soil should be moved around on site.
Asleson added that once the developer had finished establishing the soil, no heavy
machinery should be used on site, or different, smaller machinery could be used.
Powell described that the Watershed District wanted short crowned driveways to
increase infiltration. The City required a 30 -foot setback from the right -of -way
according to the Zoning Ordinance, and allowed 46 -foot long driveways to reduce
the concentrated flow on the sides of the driveway which would ultimately
increase erosion.
Trehus inquired about a reduced slope on the driveways. Powell responded the
City would consider shorter driveways, but not crowned because no driveways
were over 10% and most were between 4 -8 %.
Staff explained the difference between urban and rural roads and noted that rural
roads were being used in a new subdivision. The W ed District recommends
storm sewer inlets to be set back from the curbs, w + he parts of the City with
storm sewers have the inlets in the curbs. Staff no vinced that this item
would have an effect on infiltration. The rur sec • ns o e City had a crowned
road going into ditches on both sides.
Grundhofer posed the question if the Ci
Powell stated that in an urban setting cur
right -of -way with ditches. W.
to make the ditch narrower
Trehus inquired abou
indicated that the City
needed to be in the right-
orporate more curbless streets.
eets consume too much of the
• 1, the slope can be slightly changed
right -of -way.
e the ditch in the right -of -way. Powell
control the ditch to maintain it, so the ditch
or an easement.
Grundhofer pointed out that a rural road used less right -of -way space than the
curb -to -curb. Powell stated that the rural road works well in the township, but due
to freeze and thaw downstream, sitting water made the ditches and culverts
difficult to maintain. He added that there were no dry swales in the City.
Chair Kukonen questioned the pros and cons of swales as an outlot. Powell
admitted that it would need to be wide enough, and that an alley would probably
form behind fences in the backyards. He agreed it would be an upfront way to
deal with drainage and would ensure against surprises for residents. Powell
indicated that some have an easement for drainage or ponding.
Trehus inquired about what was presently being done, and expressed the desire to
exceed the requirements of the Watershed District. Powell responded that
infiltration galleries are being used in Bluebill Ponds with capped,12 -inch tubes,
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
but expressed concern over the possibility that the caps could be removed, and
safety issues surrounding that situation.
Trehus questioned if the tubes were perforated. Powell answered that they were.
He added that he was concerned about small children falling into them as can
occur with uncapped wells. There is no requirement for disclosure, but the buyer
needed to know if they were located on their property.
Donlin posed the question about who would be liable. Powell responded anyone
who had contact with the property including the Watershed District, the developer,
the City Engineer and others.
Asleson added that there was a concern for toxins entering the water table.
Donlin stated that she thought it would be an eyesore. Grundhofer agreed and
questioned if they were not much higher than ground level. Asleson stated that he
was not sure what the cap looked like.
Powell stated that there was usually four inches of il, and rocks around the
tube to keep it in place.
O'Connell inquired about the City notifying r
indicated that he thought the City shou _ _ive in
for infiltration.
nts of its presence. Powell
tion about the opportunity
Donlin expressed concern for
meeting outline of the Surfa
deadline of January 31.
Watershed District's
Surface Water Manage
Council.
colony and noted in the October 24
gement Plan had inconsistencies in the
ated that the differences between the
on plan needed to be reconciled with the
by the end of January for the Metropolitan
Trehus noted that the blue heron colony was mentioned in the Rice Creek Plan, not
the Surface Water Management Plan.
Donlin asked if it was too late to discuss concerns, maybe to make a paragraph
statement and forward it to staff. Asleson responded that Wayne LeBlanc was
working toward a joint ordinance between Lino Lakes and Centerville to limit
boating in the northern section of the island, because people were water skiing
there.
Trehus questioned what was to be discussed at the meeting next month. Powell
answered that he would address infiltration standards and pond analysis, but try to
avoid a long dialogue. The ordinances would be overhauled next year.
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
Trehus expressed concern over erosion control and site inspections. Asleson
stated that at present, the City had what it needed for enforcement. Powell added
that there was nothing in the building permit process.
Trehus stated concerns over runoff volumes leaving sites, and the desire to go
beyond the Watershed's requirements. Powell answered that at the present time
the City did exceed the Watershed's requirements, because the Watershed gives
credits to developers for their efforts, while the City does not, but required
compliance in ponding.
Trehus indicated that Peggy Sand had mentioned that runoff in the Comprehensive
Plan should take into consideration the tolerance of an area as a factor. Powell
stated that upstream runoff volumes might not matter to the Rice Creek
Watershed, but downstream volumes could cause standing water which would
create more wear and tear on culverts and ditches, possibly the need to replace
culverts to control the volume rate.
Trehus pointed out that the City should go beyond in
overall health of surface water and groundwater.
a matter of trading volume for quality.
tion for the sake of the
responded that it may be
Trehus submitted that the City should plan de
sensitive. Asleson concurred indicatin • . hat resi
is disturbed.
ment away from areas that are
lose if the ecological system
A. Clearwater Creek Third Ad
development was the first C
past correspondence wit
American Prairies, in
the site. The overflow
n indicated that the Clearwater Creek
velopment for the City. Staff reviewed
vironmental Services Company and North
.S. map showing the prairie restoration on
as implemented on site.
Donlin stated that much of `" e greenways were wetlands and noted that the park
was not a natural park. Asleson responded that the residents were excited about it.
Donlin indicated that there were too many visual barriers. Kukonen stated that the
density needed to be adjusted when the Subdivision Ordinance was established.
Asleson noted that the ditch was raised per the request of the Environmental Board
and the Watershed District, and the natural area was coming back. The oak
woodland was surviving well. The area on the map El-E5 had been sprayed,
burned, sprayed again, seeded and will probably be burned again in the spring due
to reed canary grass. Area A4 needed to be taken care of and in areas A -B,
Buckthorn had been eradicated. Nothing had been done in greenways B or C, and
they had been notified that the City needs to be informed on what had been done
and when.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
Chair Kukonen inquired about the results of the application of Roundup on the
prairie grasses. Asleson stated that it was a recommendation, but they would
probably burn the area.
Grundhofer added that the plants would only be affected if they were actively
growing at the time of application, and expressed concern over certain early
growing plants.
Donlin asked if Asleson had been involved in the burn in greenway A. Asleson
responded that he had not, but it was a springtime burn.
Trehus inquired about the location of any restoration management reseeding.
Asleson answered the reseeding followed the eradication of Buckthorn on the
greenways including mesic and wetland grasses.
Donlin questioned if mowing the buffer strips was done in chunks or on the
perimeters, and what the response was of the residents. Asleson answered he did
not know, but most people understood following the s distributed by the
developer.
Donlin posed the question about the resident
Asleson pointed out that it was difficult to pr
changing environmental factors. He a.;. ed that
collection.
noti 1 of planned burns.
prescribed burns because of
was a need for data
Donlin asked who was to pay wor � sleson responded that Mr. Quigley
had escrowed dollars.
Donlin stated that the
the canary grass neede
was not the best example
p for the maintenance. Asleson answered that
t in check. Staff admitted that, although the site
nservation Development, some had been done.
C. Wildland Urban Interface
i) Fire Risk Assessment Milo Bennett — Asleson stated that Mr. Bennett
had not arrived, so he would summarize the discussion. The reason for the
Fire Risk Assessment was so the Fire Department would know the risks
involved in a call, and future renovations could incorporate changes to
reduce fire risk for residents. Staff noted that the Fire Department would
not send firefighters into certain areas because of the high heat fire risk.
Mr. Bennett will be holding neighborhood meetings to talk about reducing
fire risk and increasing biodiversity. Pines were not native to the area, but
if pines were introduced in yards, the result would be an increased fire risk.
It is possible to obtain grant money from the DNR to talk with residents
about decreasing risk.
•
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
Chair Kukonen inquired if staff had visited Evergreen Trail. Asleson
stated that there was deplotia blight and pine bark beetle present. White
pines were the only ones native to the area. Staff indicated that the risk
needed to be reduced and stands needed to be thinned.
Donlin commented that the push for red pines may have been a mistake for
the DNR.
Grundhofer stated that in the southwest corner of the map there was a stand
of oaks, and expressed concern about fire risk. Asleson answered that the
risk was not as high as for pines. He added that the Minnesota land
classification that the DNR was putting together would clarify the issues.
Donlin inquired regarding how much credibility Jason _ had who was
contracted to do the project for the DNR. Asleson responded that he was
an astute botanist, and had the trust of the DNR and City staff.
Donlin questioned his years of experience. A, • n answered that he had
years of researching, and had worked for P •n Environmental. The
DNR found that Lino Lakes had very di e e stems, the most of any
in the local area. The project results 11 h� dete -`'ne the locations of
the greenways, and identify locations gotiate protection. Staff noted
that the proposed deadline for f - dwork �: ovember 7, and he was in
the process of organizing the in '. ich included Carlos Avery
and probably Hugo.
Grundhofer presente
regarding opport
tha
share grant, an
was to be develop
wait.
that was available through the DNR
'n funds to purchase land. Asleson
of the grant book, had applied for a 50/50 cost
stated that it would pay 100 %. But, because it
there was no rush to purchase, they decided to
Grundhofer addressed the issue of the land behind the elementary school.
Asleson answered that the City needed a Conservation Ordinance. He
added that the College of Natural Resources was doing a wetland
assessment of the area, looking at hypothetical wetland protection.
O'Connell inquired about whether the older developments with fire risk
had been shown to the Economic Development people. Asleson stated Mr.
Bennett was going to take the lead on the project, and staff would be a
resource. He indicated that it could be incorporated into zoning laws.
Donlin expressed concern about discussing prescribed burns and the fear
that might surround the issue due to the assessment. Asleson noted that the
areas were small and easy to contain, and prescribed burns would actually
•
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
reduce the fire risk overall. Staff agreed that there was a need to be
careful.
Grundhofer stated that she filled out the questionnaire and mentioned the
confusion between spruce and pines.
ii) Minnesota Land Classification/Update — Asleson noted that a date had
not been set, but he would like to have a presentation on Wildland Urban
Interface for the entire City. Donlin added that the City Council needed to
be present.
Asleson stated that reviewing the Management Plan was a precursor for the
project. All Boards and Council needed to agree on carrying capacity.
Asleson noted the Osprey pole location on the map.
D. Trade A Tree — Asleson indicated the database of affected trees on GPS was 240.
He referred to the maps that many were jackpines. T
to Ms. Smith so she could speak with affected rem
would be identified with the updated 2001 GPS
this winter and replanting done in the spring
Chair Kukonen inquired if there was a
would be approached which were unde
ata would then be given
The species and locations
work would be done
iority h ' sleson indicated that all
E. NEMO — Asleson stated that • + • • n Jan needed to be set for Planning and
Zoning and Council to atten+ • ' on surface water management, which
will be funded by sever. i He gave a brief background on the
organization which b at t ` U ersity of Connecticut. The City has to have
a GIS build out model w .;;; zo ' g, land use, and percent of impervious that will
be used to show future im u ough the use of comparative photography. He
indicated that it was a good •pportunity for environmental education. There was
also a need for data collection on a calibration study resulting in volumes causing
a backing up of the system.
Donlin stated that she was enthusiastic about the opportunity. Asleson added that
the purpose of NEMO was to simplify the process so it was easily understood by
the average citizen. They would also volunteer to assist in writing ordinances.
Grundhofer asked how the Board could stress the importance of the presentation.
Asleson stated that this was the most important opportunity to promote that will be
occurring in the next year.
Chair Kukonen inquired when it would happen. Asleson stated he tried for
January, but they were already booked with other municipalities.
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
Donlin stated that she was hoping water volumes could be explained and not
merely a discussion held on surface water management. Asleson assured the
Board that NEMO would be able to address water volumes.
F. Residential Moratorium — Asleson stated he spoke with Mr. Smyser who
indicated public hearings were planned for December 17, 2001 and January 14,
2002 on the residential moratorium covering residential lots and MUSA. Minor
subdivisions and the 400 units on the books would not be affected.
Trehus stated that the Planning and Zoning Board had tabled it pending
Metropolitan Council's decision on the Comprehensive Plan. Asleson responded
that they were not linked, but had already been pursued. Donlin added this was a
direct result of the Environmental Board's actions.
Asleson indicated that it would give the Board one year, so it was a good time for
NEMO and Wildland Urban Interface.
E. NEMO (continued) — Donlin stated that NEMO sho
vision as it relates to carrying capacity. Asleson u
final result, not the timeline.
F. Residential Moratorium (continued) — Tre
the goal, and yet was doing the opposit He
were sound or unsound. He stated it w
possible parallel to North Oaks.
ow about the 2020
he Board to focus on the
ointed out that the City adopted
guidance on policies that
related and inquired about a
G. Pheasant Preserve Update ed the application had been submitted
and was being processes ,.B d they received the acceptance for the bridge.
Trehus stated that it ap . ed o of character for this particular developer.
Asleson noted that the de = r had a concern for tree preservation, and the
critique would focus on Sh eline Management.
7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A. Forestry — Asleson stated that the rams had to be repaired to work in the area
of oak wilt.
B. Solid Waste Recycling — Asleson announced that SCORE money was
available which needed to be used for recycling education.
C. Meeting Minutes — Asleson indicated there were some issues on the August
minutes after they had been accepted as a final draft.
• Chair Kukonen inquired about the route of the minutes after they left were
completed by the recording secretary. The recording secretary indicated that
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2001
the minutes went to the TimeSaver Secretarial office, and after being reviewed
were submitted to the City. Asleson added that after Ms. Bugge receives
them, they go to his mailbox for reviewal, then to the Environmental Board
for final approval, and compiled in the minute book.
D. Newsletter — Donlin pointed out recreation made up a large portion of the
newsletter, but it was lacking in community news features. Asleson explained
that recreation programs generated revenue for the City and program
information needed to get out to residents.
Donlin noted that the newsletter from North Oaks was more balanced and she
believed the issue of Buckthorn should be included in the City's newsletter.
Asleson responded that she or anyone could contribute to the newsletter. He
stated that there was a cougar sighting in Peregrine Pass. The sighting was
being confirmed by a conservation officer for the State. There were also
bobcat sightings in the City.
E. Next Meeting — Chair Kukonen suggested Dece 19, 2001 for the next
meeting date.
Grundhofer inquired about the meetings
between Rice and Baldwin Lakes. She q
curbs. Asleson stated the project w at the
bounds of the City, the Shoreline 0
City had not received any plans as ye
way concerning the bridge
ned the issue of curbs versus no
ty level, but within the
others aren't factors. The
O'Connell stated that th
8. ADJOURN
s were advertised.
There being no further buss Grundhofer moved to adjourn at 9:18 p.m.
O'Connell seconded the mot n. Motion passed unanimously.
Transcribed by:
Brigette Blesi
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
10