Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 <br />Grundhofer asked if the owner was the same person as all of Pheasant Hills. Asleson <br />responded that it was. <br />Chair Kukonen inquired about the need for variances, and would it necessitate adaptation <br />of the ordinance to the variances. Asleson responded by reading the Surface Water <br />Management Ordinance, adding that Mr. Hovey recommended buffers. <br />O'Connell noted Mr. Hovey's letter to Mr. Smyser concerning the grading plan. It <br />appeared everyone agreed that it was a disaster. Trehus concurred, noting that a <br />recommendation to deny could be based on: <br />• The Shoreline Ordinance. <br />• The grading of the entire island. <br />• The island was described as one highly sensitive for aquifer contamination of hours to <br />minutes range due to the soil types. <br />Grochala addressed Mr. Hovey's letter to Mr. Smyser stating that the proposal was not <br />consistent with the building setbacks. He pointed out that ooking at the PDO the intent <br />would have a cluster with a common area Asleson dis e d stating that it was a <br />standard cookie cutter approach. <br />Trehus inquired if the shoreline zone could be 'nt. d fo o to three homes. <br />Asleson answered that they would still need vari <br />Grochala noted that a variance was for the <br />reasonable use of the land. <br />ations where the ordinance denied a <br />O'Connell asked if there were sta +ands. Grochala explained that the Shoreline <br />Overlay was based on state project was not an example of it <br />Trehus stated that the ordi s generous, and there was no need to allow for a <br />variance for this project. <br />Grundhofer made a motion to recommend to City Council deny Pheasant Hills 12th <br />Addition based on inconsistencies with the shoreline ordinance and statewide standards <br />for the management of shoreline areas. O'Connell seconded the motion. Motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD BUSINESS <br />A. Joint Meeting /City Council — Grochala indicated the meeting would take place on <br />October 17, 2001, from 7 -9 p.m. in the Community Room. <br />Grundhofer inquired about the reason for waiting until after the meeting for new <br />members of the Board. Grochala answered it was because the Council wanted the Board <br />to come to agreement of the goals and responsibilities of the Board before new members <br />5 <br />