Laserfiche WebLink
Agenda Item 5A <br />Environmental Board Meeting Date: June 26, 2002 <br />Topic: Stoneybrook Development/Preliminary Plat <br />Background: The following minutes are from the March 27th Environmental <br />Board Meeting. At that time the Stoneybrook Preliminary Plat was discussed and <br />passed on to the Planning and Zoning Board. <br />ACTION ITEMS <br />A. Stoneybrook, Preliminary Plat, Rezone, MUSA/Comp Plan Amendment <br />Asleson indicated that there were three development areas. He reviewed the <br />background material. The property was guided for low- density sewered residential <br />development in the Comprehensive Plan. The developer was requesting MUSA allocation, <br />and rezoning from R -Rural to R -1X -Low Density Residential, and approval for a 111 -lot <br />subdivision. There were 19.2 acres of wetland, with 2.06 requiring mitigation, which would <br />be accomplished on site, and 58.87 acres of upland. The site was very wet, and infiltration <br />techniques were limited, so water quality design was important. The water basin areas <br />should be protected from compaction and planted with a buffer of native plants. Basin <br />filtration capacities should be enhanced with organic bed establishment in flow areas, such <br />as an organic pond area. <br />Schneider inquired if the recommendations were binding. Asleson responded that <br />they were only recommendations. <br />Grundhofer pointed out that there was a development on Ward's Lake adjacent to <br />this development, and asked if they were both aware of each other's impact and the <br />combined impact. Asleson indicated they were being dealt with individually. <br />Asleson continued reviewing the background material. The soil was very <br />insensitive to ground water pollution, except for a small area in the South East comer that <br />is in the Vadnais Lake Area Watershed District. Additional water volume discharges <br />should be minimized. A sequencing plan and a management plan including a 3 -year <br />contract with a landscaping company should be submitted. He urged that no soils should <br />be hauled off the site or brought on the site without permission from the City. The <br />sequencing plan should indicate responsibility for cleanup after the last house was <br />completed including the fencing. The landscape- screening plan was submitted for Birch <br />Street, but staff had concems about Colorado Spruce and the maple was not hardy for the <br />soil. <br />Grundhofer questioned if there were any acceptable conifers. Asleson stated that <br />the only native conifers were white pines located in northern Anoka County, but were not <br />native or adapted to this area. He conceded that a white spruce might grow if they wanted <br />a spruce. <br />O'Connell inquired about whether willows were native. Asleson indicated the <br />water willow was possible. <br />