My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/26/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
06/26/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 1:55:19 PM
Creation date
7/31/2014 1:56:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
06/26/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Better Site Design <br />o <br />Streets do need to be wider when they serve higher density developments. possible, <br />eet parking. to <br />design a relatively narrow street even when housing densi ties begin to require more o <br />common solution is the use of queuing streets. In the queuing street design, only one traffic lane is used ed <br />and parking lanes serve as queuing lanes 990eand oncoming Figure 1.2 for an llustration). <br />pass by (Bray and Rhodes, <br />Communities have a significant opportunity to reduce impervious cover by revising their street standards, <br />so that streets are the minimum width to carry traffic and meet residential parking demand. <br />PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES ABOUT STREET WIDTH <br />cernsabout parking, safety, fire <br />Any effort to narrow residential streets will need to satisfy community concerns P <br />truck access, congestion and other factors. Much of the s these concerns. <br />available research profiled in Table 1.2, however, <br />suggests that careful design of narrow streets can address <br />Parking Demand <br />The need for on- street parking is often used to justify wider residential streets. siont, 2 spaces can usually <br />that 2 or 2.5 parking spaces be provided for each home. Depending on its d P <br />be provided by the driveway which leaves at most one space <br />seven feet wide. Providing a continuous <br />on- street parking spaces need to be about 20 feet long and <br />lane on both sides of the street, however, is a very inefficient a and ex empve way to seatisfy <br />this <br />relatively minor parking need. Each on- street parking lane f one or both of the on- street parking lanes also <br />(Sykes, 1989) while creating unutilized parking capacity. <br />serve as a traffic lane (i.e, a queuing street), both traffic movement and parking needs can be met by a <br />narrower street. <br />Street Width and Safety <br />The potential for increased vehicle- pedestrian accidents is often ited for not <br />safer than narrower streets. <br />Many studies, however, indicate that narrow residential streets may <br />Federal Highway Administration (1997) noted that narrow street widthhs tend 19o92 reduce her vehicle which <br />drivers travel. This finding has also been ndte noted by t eotent�al accidents. Slower speeds also reduce the <br />provide drivers with more fime to react p P <br />severity of injuries sustained in accidents. <br />Fire Safety <br />Another common impediment is the perception <br />emergency vehicles, particularly fire vehicles. <br />needed to ensure access. However, a number <br />eighteen feet (Table 1.3). <br />that narrow streets do not provide adequate access fc <br />The conventional wisdom is that very wide streets ar <br />of local fire codes permit roadway widths as narrow a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.