10/30/2002 Env Bd Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Item -by -item guidance Chapter of the project will be unusually noisy — the blasting of rock, for example; prolonged; affect especially sensitive receptors — a hospital, for example; or otherwise can be expected to have unusual noise impacts during construction. The locations of and distances to sensitive receptors should be given. For projects in the vicinity of major noise sources, such as highways, railroads or airports, noise levels should be estimated using generally ac- cepted noise prediction models, regardless of whether the noise standards are legally enforceable with respect to the project. Mitigation measures should be described, and their effects as- sessed. Projects requiring PCA Indirect Source air quality permits, de- scribed under item 23, often require a noise analysis as part of the permit application, which should be induded in the EAW. • Dust. Wind -blown dust from construction, demolition, haul roads and other activities should be addressed here instead of under item 23 if the quantities of dust will be large, prolonged or otherwise greater than routinely expected during project con- struction. Mitigation measures should be discussed. 25. Nearby resources • Archaeological, historical or architectural resources. Contact the State Historical Preservation Office, Minnesota His- torical Society, listed in the appendix, for information about possible archaeological or historical resources at the site. A local "heritage preservation" committee may also provide assistance. Where archaeological resources exist, a site survey by a qualified archeologist may be necessary. Results of the survey should be presented in the EAW. • Prime or unique farm lands and agricultural pre- serves. Information on prime and unique farmlands is available from the Natural Resources Conservation Service or the Minne- sota Planning Office Land Management Information Center. The local unit of govemment (county or city) has information on any established agricultural preserves. • Designated parks, recreational areas or trails. Loca- tions of these may be obtained from the local unit's planning and zoning or recreation office or from the DNR. • Scenic views and vistas. These may include spectacular viewing points along lakes, rivers or bluffs; virgin timber tracts; prairie remnants; geological features; waterfalls; specimen trees; or plots of wildflowers. Many are not officially designated or marked, but because of their local or statewide interest should be considered by the RGU. Impacts on the visual quality or integrity of these resources should be addressed as well as the physical impacts. 26. Visual impacts Describe any nonroutine impacts that may be due to the emission of light or a "visual nuisance" caused by the project during con- struction or operation. An example of an emission impact is an intense Tight causing a glare problem for passing motorists. Ex- amples of "visual nuisances" include lights on tall communication towers intruding on the visual integrity of a scenic vista, or a large water vapor plume from an exhaust stack or cooling tower. 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations Discuss whether the project is subject to any official govemmental management plans adopted for the area. These could indude a local comprehensive land use plan (likely in any city in the Twin Cities metropolitan area); a local comprehensive water plan; or management plans specific to resource areas under public man- agement such as parks, watershed districts or rivers. Plans of all levels of govemment should be considered here: local, regional, state and federal. The local planning and zoning office is probably the best source of this kind of information. If no such plans exist in the area, the EAW should so indicate. If there is a plan, but the project is not subject to the plan, the EAW should indicate why not. If the project is subject to a plan, the EAW should identify its requirements relevant to the project and discuss how the project complies with the plan. The RGU should consult with the govern- ment unit responsible for the implementation of the plan regarding provisions that relate to the project and about the consistency of the project with the plan. Emphasis in the EAW should be given to any conflicts or incompatibilities between the project and plan provisions that relate to the environment or use of natural resources. 28. Infrastructure and public services Identify new or expanded public services or public works neces- sary to serve the project such as sewers, storm sewers, streets, water mains, water towers, power lines, gas lines, police protec- tion, fire protection and schools. NOTE: Any infrastructure utilities constructed to serve the project and not independent of this specific project must be treated in the EAW as part of the project for example, a road built to serve a specific project must be treated as part of the project and its impacts should be included in the EAW. According to the EQB rules, all "connected actions" are to be reviewed as one project. Connected actions are defined as projects related in any of the three following ways: (1) one project would induce the other, (2) one project is a prerequisite for another, or (3) neither project is justified by itself (part 4410.0200, subpart 9b). Further guidance regarding connected actions is presented in Chapter 2 of the Guide to Minnesota Environmental Review Rules. Environmental Quality Board 13