My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/04/2002 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2002
>
12/04/2002 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 10:57:23 AM
Creation date
8/1/2014 10:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
12/04/2002
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The developer now has permission to extend Carl Street. The new plan lays out <br />a development proposal with Carl Street mapped. <br />Attachment 1 is a Narrative for Century Farm North, describing the new <br />proposal. <br />Attachment 2 is the Site Plan Proposal <br />John Johnson describes the amount of wetland in this area as 9.8 acres, and that <br />the ditching system effectively drains the site. <br />Before ditching, the majority of this site would have been cattail type of <br />vegetation. It appears that restoration of any of the land in this project is not <br />possible. <br />There are two areas of resource significance left of the site, and one area <br />immediately off the site on the NW corner. Previously, the Environmental Board <br />made the recommendation to try to preserve the two historic oak areas on the <br />South. It appears that it was not possible to accomplish this. <br />The other area that is of concern is an area just off the site in an area that will <br />most likely be developed in the future. The developer should demonstrate that <br />this area would not be affected by any more hydrologic changes. <br />Please take some time to look at the July 31, 2002 Environmental Board packet <br />information and maps, so that you can see the differences in proposed <br />development. <br />Options: <br />Options may be discussed further with the Developer and his Engineer at the <br />meeting. <br />Recommendation: <br />I am assuming that the recommendations of the Environmental Board will be <br />similar to the July Meeting recommendations. Additionally, the developer should <br />demonstrate that there will be no hydrologic impacts to adjacent significant <br />resources. <br />Environmental Board Comments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.