My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/26/2003 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2003
>
02/26/2003 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 10:42:48 AM
Creation date
8/1/2014 11:46:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/26/2003
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES <br />C. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING, Ryan Companies US, Inc. (Target), Lake Drivel <br />CONTINUE TO 4/11/01. <br />Staff stated at the February 13th meeting, the Planning and Zoning Board continued the public hearing related to the <br />proposal by Ryan Companies for a mixed commercial site located north of Lake Drive, adjacent to I -35W. <br />Staff recommended that the hearing be continued until April 11, 2001. <br />Mr. Wessel presented a status of the project since the last meeting. He stated the site plan was <br />changing and therefore, so was the schedule. He stated the problem was that the market did not <br />support the building of the large three pads. He stated the development team had presented the three <br />pads to the market, but could not get any interest in it. Therefore, one option would be to downsize <br />the project to eliminate the three large pads. The other option would be the replacement of the pads <br />and go with a development that was similar as to what they were originally looking at. He stated they <br />could not respond until they receive something official. He indicated they did not expect a proposal <br />until just before the May 2001 Planning & Zoning meeting. He stated more likely they would be <br />breaking ground in the fall rather than in the summer, if this project received approved. <br />Chair Schaps asked if there was any update regarding the road. Mr. Powell replied applicant still <br />wanted two accesses to the site. They had prepared an impact study of that second access and how it <br />would function and had submitted it to the County for initial review. He stated the plan would need <br />to be reevaluated with the change of the site plan. <br />Mr. Lyden asked looking at Plan A vs. Plan B economically, was there a more economic advantage to <br />one plan over the other Plan. Mr. Wessel replied the plan with the three larger pads was a larger <br />project and therefore, it would a more economically advantageous project for the City. <br />Mr. Lyden asked if they could allow the. Target to be built and wait for the remainder of the <br />development for sometime in the future. Mr. Wessel replied this could be a possibility, but Ryan ane <br />17apica & _Pezpeanov _BoapS XirLOgi.A:vo_ cacwQ <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.