My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/29/2003 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2003
>
10/29/2003 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 1:12:06 PM
Creation date
8/4/2014 11:14:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
10/29/2003
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eagle Brook Church environmental subcommittee has indicated that it will also <br />assume responsibilities for native plant restoration and maintenance. <br />Tree Preservation <br />A tree preservation plan has been submitted. There are no impacted trees <br />indicated in the plan. All tree preservation measures must be taken before any <br />soil disturbance. <br />Lighting <br />The Photometric Plan submitted for review indicates that the proposed site <br />lighting is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance requirements. Pole <br />mounted lights are proposed to be 22 feet in height. All light fixtures are <br />proposed to be hooded with a ninety degree cutoff angle. <br />Impervious Surface Coverage <br />The City's Zoning Ordinance does not specify a standard for impervious surface <br />coverage in R, Rural Zoning Districts, The PSP, Public /Semi - Public Zoning <br />District which provides for similar institutional uses, ( i.e.; schools, governmental <br />buildings,) establishes a maximum impervious percentage of 65 %. <br />Approximately 19% of the site is proposed to be impervious. <br />OPTIONS <br />1. Recommend approval of the Eagle Brook application with recommendations <br />and Environmental Board comments. <br />2. Recommend no approval. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />This staff person cannot ; address the cultural, economic, or traffic issues <br />concerning the proposal. These elements always play a role, as modeled in the <br />Lino Lakes Handbook for Conservation Development In saying this, staff <br />recommendation is <br />1. Approve the project with Environmental Board and Staff comments and <br />recommendations. <br />2. Recommend not approving. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.