My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/21/2004 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2004
>
01/21/2004 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 12:51:56 PM
Creation date
8/4/2014 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
01/21/2004
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
areas into'the design of the many parkingiotvegetated islands on the site. It is unclear <br />from the, documentifthis low impact; development praetieeiscurrentlypart•of the <br />proposal. Iiy,constructing depressed rather than raised islands and surrounding: the. <br />islands with curb cuts or concrete edges that 'slope to the interior of the islands, runoff <br />from the parking areas can: be rmutedintothese vegetated areas, then through a. piped <br />overflow into the-undcrground chambers. In this fashion Ibe first flush ofnmoff events <br />ti .zi ttieeffici <br />can be, etainedintlialiia- 'xnf'iltratonaccas , maxun}zutg, encyof the ;est<af the <br />. <br />runolytreatment train <br />Item ID: —Land Cover wrd'Irem 25-- Nearby tesour <br />The proposal Includes a .high percentage taf impervious surfaces that will cover 30 acres if <br />the projectis irupleinented Ss proposed. To preserve water quality in'the adjacent <br />regional park stormwater runoff from the itevelopment will aced to bemanagedin an <br />ecologically sensitive manner.. <br />Portions of tbe site are identified as.regionaily important nthe joint Me tropolitan <br />Council and MinncaotaDepartment ofilature:l'Resources;Regional NiapuaiResources <br />Inventory and Assessment(NRI/A). The PAW should acknowledge this designation. <br />Areas.of parttcrilar concern include:' <br />•. proposed, reductions in wooded/forested land cover abutting the regional park; <br />• potential loss of the island of woodsin the southwest/central part of the site; <br />P. use ofnative vegetation in he:proposed urban/suburbanlandscaping where there <br />are developmenit transitions.to the rein* park's natural areas. <br />Item 19 — °'Geologicl`iazards and Soll "Conditions <br />This item states that "excessively drained soils and relatively high ground watertable <br />creates a potential for.ground water contamination:" The sanitary waste issue is <br />addressed ;duougb the municipal sanitary treatment off site. It' is.recoinmend t attiiis <br />information also be considered when managing stormwaferrunoff. Deep stormwater <br />ponds would have the pteiliial to directlyc9ntaminate ground water witb oils, road saltt <br />and other containinates aasociated with roads and parking lots. <br />bear 21 —Traffic <br />The EAW.states thatyear'2020 traffic volumes for full build -out of the site will be part of <br />a'simulation pmgiranr that is being developed. it further States that results of the'traffic <br />simulation asit relates;to the regionaltransportation system will be shared and discussed <br />with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MOOT) and.the.Anoka County Highway <br />department. The"nesults ofthe traffic simulation model should also be shared and <br />discussed withthe•Metropolitan`Council. <br />There is curve ntlyno transit serviette the proposed development. However, Routes 250 <br />and' 262. do operate local service in the area, and Route 250 travels past the site on Lake <br />Drive on its '1/41eadheaeMati Mating to and from St, Joseph's Church Park 8i Ride lot. Metro <br />Transit and Metro Transit Services can consider rerouting: one or both of these routes to <br />offer residents sserviceto both downtown Minneapolis and downtown St.Paul. In <br />3 <br />5 <br />RESPONSE <br />2 The majority of the interior parking lot islands do not have sufficient area to treat and store the amount of <br />runoff that will be generated from the proposed development, but these islands will consist of a pervious <br />surface that will provide some infiltration. Detention ponds and underground infiltration chambers will be <br />utilized to treat and store runoff from the site. Where applicable, a drop curb design will be used to provide <br />access to infiltration ponds. Currently, the site plan includes four onsite ponds that will receive runoff from <br />impervious areas through a drop curb design. <br />3 At the time the EAW was written, the City was not aware of the Regional Natural Resources Inventory and <br />Assessment (NRI /A) and that the MNDNR and Metropolitan Council had identified a portion of the site in the <br />assessment. The Metropolitan Council was contacted, and a copy of the NRI /A map was attained. <br />Preservation efforts have been incorporated into the site plan that will reduce impacts on a grove of mature <br />trees located on the eastem side of the site (adjacent to the park). Furthermore, the proposed development <br />includes natural open space areas and vegetative buffers between the development and the park boundary. <br />4 Suitable separation (3 to 4 feet) will be maintained between the bottom of detention ponds/infiltration <br />chambers and groundwater to minimize the potential for contamination. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.