Laserfiche WebLink
Nl chaea'C el <br />Conoraunity,E <br />Citjinf Lino <br />6400 Town _Center <br />Lino Lakes,, T 15014 <br />Milulestita Department of Natural Resourrces <br />l200Warner oad <br />St.PauI, Miu meaota 85104 ; <br />651.772.7900 <br />rabel 14.2643 <br />i E; 1,4:441 4uc aWgo Ella. 4n .tCsseiimentWoiksitieet(EAW) <br />MarlVl .tikochals= <br />The'ilteparttnettt ofNattuat resources ° AMR) 'has reviewed the lAW, for the propo d L egsey.at Woods <br />Edge Dcvclopmcntu► 41* qtYPTURiakei. • In.ggner4 the EAW appears to tic; compiete and.accurato. <br />We offer the following t: onunent5•foryourconsideration.; <br />Cover Tzi es iIttem No.10) <br />Table 1 shows the,conversion of 4 b acres ofwooded/forest cover This may -resultliffie reanovat"of`a <br />aignrficant +�nuio€ X od from the site. Depending 0-44 .condition ,Ibis `t ood n y be Pied* <br />Landscaping aal,'firewood,;orasta.replac mentforcoalint 'heproductionofenergy. tileadeveloper <br />should contact,1ean Mou Regional Forest.. ihilizaf otrltnd Maiketing Sp allai:(651. - 7567), for <br />advice bn ihiissubject." <br />WaterOuailtvs SurfaceWater.Rundff(teinldo Ili <br />The project proposer has ' done^ a good job :of incorporating stormwater infiltration: technologies into e <br />plans for thi s The EAW states that the project will result in a o percent :post- develrpmentt increase. <br />in runed:rates, 'We reca»nrnoad that this:contra be coupled. with a zero•percentincrease °iu runoff <br />volumes. Imgprovementia.volun.e cpntrolwould be desimbla, especially considering that t i` project will <br />resuitin a 43.perceat increase n impervious cover in theahoreland district ofMarshan Lake. <br />Item No,.,17bstates"that treated stdanwatereiti vRill be inf. krated or400004 ti ltretiands. Tf eFAW <br />does not-state. the change in stdenwaterinmoff volume'Stosn * site:. This information would he useful: <br />and see r+eoo that itbe3t cludt d is the.E,AW.. <br />Thank youter tbeopportwuty to tevrew this project aad the EAW 'Welookforward to receiving, your <br />record of decision anti responses to comments;at the conclusion of emiirodmental review . Minnesota, <br />Rules part'4410d900, subparts 4 ands require you to:senct us'Iour;Record sendus ofl3ecision within.five days <br />of dle ciding;en t isaction, 1! -you haveany questions about these*Imnientti4aease. calf WayneBanstad, <br />the region* ental: Assessment:Ecologist. at 6.5.1772- 7940,: <br />iiniquatOpposiuniiy oy Who Values Ph/crafty <br />owiriloima5on.1st 841157 .14584455657 TM 551.2485484 1.6006574820 <br />RESPONSE <br />The City will evaluate alternative uses of wood removed from the site and will contact the Regional Forest <br />Utilization and Marketing Specialist for further assistance. <br />2 The storm water management plan for the proposed development incorporates wet sediment basins and <br />infiltration systems (ponds/basins and underground chambers) to treat and store runoff, which results in a <br />system that exceeds the Rice Creek Watershed and City storm water requirements for treatment and <br />storage: However, as is typically the case with most developments, the post - development conditions will <br />result in an overall increase of runoff volume. This increase in runoff volume is likely to only occur in the <br />George Watch Lake Watershed because the storm water management plan establishes a drainage system <br />that routes nearly all runoff from the site to the east and into the George Watch Lake Watershed. Runoff <br />from impervious surfaces that are within the Marshan Lake Shoreland District is directed to a series of <br />infiltration basins/ponds that eventually outlets to a wetland, which is tributary to another extensive wetland <br />complex located in the George Watch Lake watershed. Therefore, the increase in runoff volume from the <br />site will have no net effect on the Marshan Lake Watershed and Shoreland District. <br />