Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances: <br />With regards to the proposal including the use of a planned unit development due to <br />multiple inconsistencies with ordinance requirements: While such requirements may, or <br />may not, have environmental impact, the proposer should enumerate, as a LIST, all such <br />requirements that cannot be met. While this may be outside of the scope of this EAW, it <br />is not outside the scope of the proposed development project. If not required here, it <br />should be required prior to ANY project go /no -go determinations being made. <br />Section 28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. <br />While water and sewer services are partially addressed in this EAW, there is insufficient <br />data with regards to how they will be transported across the bridge, including materials, <br />failure rates, etc. as previously discussed in these comments. Additionally, there is <br />essentially no discussion of electric transmission means or natural gas pipeline(s). <br />Proposer states that City standard cul -de -sac radii are proposed to serve as adequate turn <br />around area for emergency vehicles and snow removal equipment. I am assuming that <br />"snow removal equipment" would not be City -owned /operated equipment but privately <br />contracted by proposed development association as the road is proposed to be a private <br />drive. <br />Section 30. Other potential environmental impacts. <br />Obviously, the EAW statement is false. Other potential environmental impacts not <br />addressed (or inadequately addressed) abound as outlined in the other sections of these <br />comments. <br />Section 31. Summary of issues. <br />In addition to the EAW summary, refer to all sections of comments above for additional <br />issues that need to be addressed. <br />EAW Comments, Pheasant Hills 12th Addition <br />Page 6 <br />