My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/23/2005 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
02/23/2005 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 11:59:47 AM
Creation date
8/5/2014 9:03:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
02/23/2005
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 26, 2005 <br />C. AUAR Update <br />Asleson stated that residents and property owners were invited to the meetings. <br />Bor inquired about the number of people attending the meetings. She mentioned <br />that if no minutes were taken, or a listing of people attending it would be difficult <br />to build trust with residents. Asleson stated that there was a sign up sheet for the <br />agency meetings. He was encouraged to see that many agencies regularly <br />attended the meetings, and favored the conservation approach. He noted several <br />agencies that had representation at all the meetings. Among them were the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife that were concerned with loss of habitat, the Minnesota <br />Department of Natural Resources, Soil Conservation District, Metropolitan <br />Council, and Rice Creek Watershed District. At present, they were attempting to <br />understand the water flow of the area, which included finding a two -foot change <br />in elevation. Twenty agencies were going to be asked to respond to any plan <br />recommended. <br />Bauman expressed interest in the questions the agencies were asking. She <br />admitted the water infiltration was difficult to delineate. Asleson agreed it was <br />the most important concern at this time. He indicated he was going to speak with <br />residents. He found that when the traffic issue was figured, the "Racino" was a <br />factor. <br />Smith stated that residents had historic information about the area. <br />Bor discussed the methodology, and indicated that the response time appeared <br />narrow to respond to the proposals. Asleson answered that the process was <br />dynamic, and could reduce the time necessary to form a composite proposal. <br />O'Connell noted an example in Woodbury, that certain companies wanted a <br />connection to the highway, and they eventually paid for that connection. <br />Asleson inquired about Board members' thoughts on the proposed growth <br />potential. Smith responded that even the conservative figures were sobering. <br />Bor referred to the sewer capacities, that the estimates were considerable. She <br />admitted that the meetings had been excellent and very informative. <br />D. Fox Den Acres Update <br />Asleson stated that the proposal had been approved. There still remained minor <br />questions on surface water. They were working on the stewardship. A <br />homeowners committee would hire an ecologist who would report to the City. He <br />recommended Jason Huvseth because he knew the area, and was well respected. <br />A Lino Lakes resident called staff to express interest in buying one of the lots. <br />4 DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.