My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/27/2005 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2005
>
04/27/2005 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 11:47:09 AM
Creation date
8/5/2014 9:46:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/27/2005
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING MARCH 30, 2005 <br />• Lighting should be flush - mounted with recessed bulbs. <br />• The new monument sign would follow the lighting specifications of the City. <br />O'Connell made a motion to recommend approval with the recommendations <br />from staff and the Board. Bauman seconded the motion. Motion carried with 5 <br />votes and one abstention from Bor. <br />B. Resolution Supporting CRT Waste <br />Asleson briefly reviewed the resolution. <br />Grundhofer asked if Asleson supported the resolution. Asleson indicated he <br />supported the resolution. He was seeking a method that would not involve the <br />taxpayers, and believed up front costs could be helpful. <br />Chair O'Dea called for a discussion. <br />Asleson stated that an important component should be no reliance on government <br />solutions. <br />Bor inquired if industry was working for a more compatible method of disposal. <br />Chair O'Dea recommended the last word in the first line should be "have" instead <br />of "has." In addition the areas indicating "(name of organization)," should have <br />"City of Lino Lakes." <br />Bor recommended adding a statement at the end of the document. "We support <br />technological innovation to reduce or eliminate hazardous substances contained in <br />these products." <br />Grundhofer made a motion to support the resolution as amended. Kukonen <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />6. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />A. Review and Comment of the Apollo Landing Draft Landscaping and <br />Aesthetics Document. <br />Asleson indicated he was willing to receive comments from the Board. <br />Kukonen expressed concern about the environmental impact of treated wood <br />privacy fences. He recommended using environmentally friendly and arsenic -free <br />fencing. <br />3 DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.