|
VILLAGE AT HARDWOOD CREEK BOUNDARY K
<br />x\ t\
<br />\ ;\ \
<br />i 1 / 1r,/
<br />/,
<br />D TOPO SURVEY
<br />ST -12$
<br />6:910.2
<br />1)GW: 909.6
<br />I
<br />I\
<br />\\ 1 \\
<br />\ 1 }
<br />/ I` >'n
<br />f
<br />"Y:Y' . Wer' y. Y... /YY '\^`� -�
<br />l.ti... _ ., .., x Zlrxl.fY•./y r.A. _ AJati.A.lX 1.:,%
<br />'
<br />- _ )
<br />I I j, i \ 11//
<br />j f I I .e.. ) _ ....
<br />>4:
<br />t
<br />Possible location of R/W
<br />strip to be acquired. Exact
<br />alignment and width unknown,
<br />111. CONTOUR INTERVAL
<br />VERTICAL DATUM - NAD 88
<br />x 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION
<br />�94a� DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR
<br />-CD DENOTES UTILITY POLE
<br />-•-
<br />DENOTES CHAIN LINK FENCE
<br />DENOTES BARBED WIRE FENCE
<br />L5 DENOTES WELL
<br />® DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX
<br />DENOTES TREE 1110
<br />DENOTES DRAIN TILE VENT
<br />MAIN ST. (CO. RD. 14)
<br />NOTE IN RE VERTICAL CONTROL;
<br />THE ELEVATION DATA SHOWN IS BASED ON A MN DOT BENCHMARK NAMED "CENTERVILLE 890r. THIS BENCHMARK IS LOCATED 13 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST 911NG WALL OF BRIDGE N0. 02803
<br />(COUNTY RD. 40. 14) OVER INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 35, THE NAVO 88 (1994 ADJ.) ELEVATION FOR 1141S BENCHMARK (PER MN00T) 15 931.79 FEET. T.K,D.A. PREPARED PLANS FOR A SANITARY SEWER
<br />AND ONE/THIRD OF PROJECT 'TERMINUS EXTENDED MANHOLE USED APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET NORTH OF NE
<br />BENCHMARK 0282 0 (APPROXIMATELYE40 OF MAIN STREET FEET SOUTHERLY 01 CEN ERVILLE THE EASTERLY 09 00010
<br />BENCHMARK (ELEVATION; 931.90 1401/D 29, 1971 ADJ, REFERENCE L 22298) AS A RESULT OF THE TWO PROJECTS BEING BASED ON DIFFERENT BENCHMARKS WITH DIFFERENT DATUMS ANO ADJUSTMENTS. IT
<br />IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ONE POINT (SUCH AS THE INVERT ELEVATION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED MANHOLE) TO HAVE THE SAME ELEVATION IN BOTH PLANS/SURVEYS,
<br />BY USING ELEVATIONS IN NAVO 88 DATUM, 2002 ADJ., THE THEORETICAL DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATIONS BETWEEN 1140 TWO BENCHMARKS IS 0.57 FT. 1HE OBSERVED DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATION BETWEEN THESE
<br />TWO BENCHMARKS IS 0.58 FEET. THEREFORE. IT IS NECESSARY TO SUBTRACT 0.57 FT. FROM ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY TO OBTAIN THE ELEVATION WHICH WOULD MATCH MOST
<br />APPROXIMATELY T.K.D.A.'S PLANS.
<br />EXAMPLES: T.NH. STA. 39 +50. EAST SIDE OF 21ST. AVENUE; T.K.O.A'S EIEV.=+909.60. OUR OBSERVED ELEVATIONS EQUALS AS 9101_ 200.5 (009.55 ELEVATION): EL. M NHOLE SOUTH OF ELEVATION MAN TEET; T.SD.A'S
<br />ELEV. =906.83; OUR OBSERVED ELEVATION EQUALS 907.35 -0.57 s 906,78, RIM OF MOST NORTHERLY MANHOLE;
<br />907.64 -0.57 = 907.07; INVERT OF MOST NORTHERLY MANHOLE; T.K.D.A'S ELEV. =877.77 (DESIGN ELEVATION): OUR OBSERVED ELEVATION EOUALS 078.43 -0.57 = 877,85.
<br />In tl tim4 Pm ieri4 \04506 Vlllaa110 wood Creek \dwg \Bosemap.dwg 7/25/2005
<br />LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
<br />The Northwest Quarter of Section 13. Township 31, Range 22. Anoka
<br />County, Minncsoln,TXCEPT the North 560.00 feet of the West 440 feet
<br />thereofnnd,
<br />The Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 31, Range 22, Anoka
<br />Canny, Al innesom.EXCEPT That pert taken for Interstate Highway for
<br />Interstate Highway Number 351: end, The South Half oldie North Holfuf
<br />the South Half of to Southwest Quarter and the South Half of the South
<br />Half of the Southwest Quartet, EXCEPT the North 330 feel of the South
<br />Three Quarters of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
<br />Section 12. Township
<br />31, Range 2222, Anoka County, Minnesota. •
<br />Thal pan Of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12,
<br />Township 31 Range 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. lying Westerly of the
<br />Westerly righ1Of-wny line °Tinterstate Highway 35E and Sonhody ofthc
<br />Easterly extension of the North line of the South Half of the Nunh I lolTof
<br />Inc I South Ilnlf of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 12.
<br />Subject to easement. restrictions and reservations of record.
<br />AREAS
<br />TOTAL GROSS AREA
<br />(EXCLUDES PROP. R/W STRIP TO CO. RD. 14)
<br />= 15,817,171 50. FT. /363.11 ACRES
<br />EXISTING R/W
<br />(EXCLUDES PROP. R/W STRIP TO CO. RD. 14)
<br />208,213 SO. FT. /4.78 ACRES
<br />PROP. FUTURE R/W
<br />(EXCLUDES PROP. R/W STRIP TO CO. RD. 14)
<br />= 188,335 SO. FT./4.32 ACRES
<br />GROSS AREA. LESS EXIST. AND PROP. FUT. R/W
<br />(EXCLU000 PROP. R/W STRIP TO CO. R0. 14)
<br />= 15,420,623 S0. FT./354.01 ACRES
<br />PIPELINE EASEMENT AREA
<br />= 279.993 50. FT./6.43 ACRES
<br />PIPELINE EASEMENT k STRUCTURE SETBACK AREA
<br />= 382,499 5O. FT. /8.713 ACRES
<br />GROSS AREA LESS EXIST, ANO PROP. FUT. R/W
<br />ANO PIPELINE AND STRUCTURE SETBACK AREA
<br />(EXCLUDES PROP. R/W STRIP TO CO. 130. 14)
<br />= 15.038,124 50. FT./345.22 ACRES
<br />PROP. R/W STRIP TO CO. RD. 14
<br />= 124,631 50. FT. /2.86 ACRES
<br />NOTE REGARDING PROPOSED PIPELINE EASEMENT:
<br />The pipeline easement over that port of the
<br />subject properly in Section 12 was never
<br />described using 0 specific centerline description.
<br />the most recent easement document, which we
<br />ore awar e of, Document Number 405813, recorded
<br />March 6 1974, calls for the ".center of the
<br />Company's original pipeline as ow located..." os
<br />the centerline of the easement.
<br />NOTE REGARDING PROPOSED PIPELINE EASEMENT:
<br />The centerline of the above described and
<br />illustrated pipeline ea ent is Intended to be
<br />coincident with (ns closely as is practical) the
<br />existing "center' pipeline
<br />NOTE: THE PIPELINE EASEMENT 5400!1 15
<br />PROPOSED AT THIS TIME AND CURRENTLY UNDER
<br />REVIEW BY KOCH REFINERY.
<br />NOTE: THE LAND BETWEEN THE SUBJECT
<br />PROPERTY AND THE FREEWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY IS
<br />UNPLATTED
<br />NOTE: REGARDING SETBACKS
<br />THE CITY PLANNER HAS INFORMED THE SURVEYOR
<br />THAT THE CURRENT SETBACKS ARE IRRELEVANT
<br />BECAUSE THE SITE I5 TO BE DEVELOPED AS A
<br />P.U.D. AND THAT ULTIMATELY THE SETBACKS 111LL
<br />REFLECT THE APPROVED PROJECT DESIGN.
<br />NOTE: ALL TITLE RESEARCH PERTAINING TO
<br />EXISTING EASEMENTS OF RECORD. LEGAL
<br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY, ETC. WAS DONE BY
<br />LAND TITLE , INC. AS AGENT FOR CHICAGO TITLE
<br />INSURANCE COMPANY. PLEASE CONTACT .10N
<br />EDSTROM (651) 697 -6127 WITH QUESTIONS IN
<br />THIS REGARD (THEIR CASE N0. 242306, 2ND.
<br />SUPPLEMENTAL)
<br />NOTE: THE SURVEYOR HAS II)T YET RECEIVED
<br />PERMISSION TO GO ONTO THE LAND SOUTH OF
<br />THE SITE CONTAINED WITHIN R1.5. 195 AND ON
<br />THE UNPLATTED LAND TO THE EAST. WHEN
<br />PERMISSION IS GRANTED , THE SURVEY WALL BE
<br />UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
<br />NOTE: ANOKA COUNTY DITCHES NUMBER 72 AND
<br />33 (55)(BRANCH NO. 5.6.7,0,AND MAIN DITCH)
<br />CURRENTLY CROSS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. ALL
<br />OF THESE DITCHES ARE TO BE REROUTED TO THE
<br />5405FACTION OF THE CONTROLLING
<br />GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES.
<br />GRAPHIC SCALE
<br />� anti
<br />( IN FEET )
<br />1 Inch = 200 FL
<br />AUG 1 5 2005
<br />CITY OF LINO LA K
<br />I hereby certify that this pion or report was prepored by me or under my
<br />direct supervision and that I am o duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows
<br />of the State of Minnesota.
<br />Richord C. Person
<br />MN Reg. No. 23300
<br />REHB 1-4,1N (
<br />C O M P A N I E S
<br />Date
<br />SHEET 2 OF 2
<br />
|