My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/04/2006 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2006
>
10/04/2006 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2014 2:57:34 PM
Creation date
8/6/2014 10:02:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
10/04/2006
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Nature's Refuge Development <br />Phase I Archaeological Survey and Architectural History Assessment <br />Page 5 <br />which Holocene (less than 10,000 years old) deposits have been significantly disturbed <br />were excluded from intensive field survey. <br />2.3.1 Shovel Testing <br />Shovel tests were excavated in areas exhibiting greater potential to contain intact <br />archaeological deposits where less than 25 percent of the ground surface was visible. <br />Tests were small, circular excavations, measuring approximately 35 to 45 centimeters <br />(cm) in diameter. A 15 — 30 m (50 — 100 ft.) testing interval was employed for shovel <br />tests, with test transects placed 15 m (50 ft.) apart. <br />All excavated soil matrices were passed through 1/4-inch hardware mesh to ensure the <br />consistent recovery of artifacts. Tests were excavated down to the C horizon, the level of <br />culturally sterile subsoil, or the water table. <br />Survey data were recorded through standardized forms and the field director's daily log. <br />Recorded information included: test locations and methods of testing; the numbers, types <br />and locations of recovered cultural materials; the depth of shovel tests and the thickness <br />of excavated soil layers; soil textures and inclusions (both natural and cultural); and soil <br />color according to Munsell® color charts. <br />2.4 ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY METHODS <br />During the field survey, the field surveyors completed an inventory of the buildings and <br />structures within the project area in order to identify properties that appeared to be 45 <br />years of age or older. Those resources were photographed and assessed for historical <br />integrity. Along with professional field observations, the Anoka County tax assessor's <br />office web site database was used to determine the approximate date of construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.