Laserfiche WebLink
watershed. FMR staff will work closely with the volunteers during monitoring events to ensure <br />protocols are followed and to provide follow -up training as needed. <br />FMR and Anoka Conservation District personnel will provide multiple levels of quality control <br />of the methods employed by the volunteers in the lab and in the field. Once collected data has <br />been quality assured, a final report will be written and a presentation developed that summarizes <br />the monitoring results. These results will be posted on FMR's website with links to and from <br />partner websites. FMR will coordinate with local partners and community organizations to share <br />published results through newsletters, websites and media outreach. <br />FMR will organize volunteers to present the SHEP results to local city councils, the county board <br />and the watershed district board highlighting correlations between their data and land uses within <br />the watershed. These presentations serve as an excellent learning opportunity for elected and <br />public officials. Hearing about water quality issues, concerns and successes directly from <br />citizens will have the greatest impact on how water resources are managed by decision - makers. <br />Volunteers often become even more passionate about the resources they monitor, and they wish <br />to participate in activities that enhance the health of their watershed. Where practical, FMR will <br />assist volunteers with planning and carrying out stewardship projects in the watershed, such as <br />river and pond clean-ups, storm drain stenciling, invasive species removals and native plantings. <br />In order to demonstrate the program's effectiveness and replicability, Dr. Julia Frost Nerbonne of <br />HECUA will design and implement an evaluation of the volunteer monitoring program which <br />will evaluate the following questions: 1. Are the volunteers providing reliable data? 2. Are <br />volunteers feeling engaged in stewardship? 3. Through which channels are monitoring results <br />being communicated to decision - makers? 4. What are the barriers and bridges to effective use of <br />volunteer data in decision - making? <br />We believe that citizen volunteer monitoring can be a powerful agent for positive change in <br />water resource protection. Our vision is to create a model program that will strengthen volunteer <br />monitoring credibility by proactively addressing and rectifying the perceived weaknesses of <br />current volunteer monitoring programs and thereby harness this power to actively engage <br />citizens in water resource enhancement. Based as it is on metrics and protocols developed by the <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the various ecoregions of Minnesota, and with a <br />thorough and independent evaluation of the model's effectiveness, the Stream Health Evaluation <br />Program model will be well- suited for use throughout the state once it is established. <br />We have chosen to develop the Stream Health Evaluation Program in partnership with the Anoka <br />Conservation District, the Rice Creek Watershed District and local cities in order to ensure the <br />program's continuation and utility. Our experience in other areas has shown that volunteer <br />monitoring can be a powerful tool for both mobilizing and energizing committed resource <br />advocates and for connecting citizens in a proactive and supportive manner to their local <br />governments in working towards common goals. We anticipate the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District and local cities will provide the annual financial support for the continuation of this <br />program. <br />Friends of the Mississippi River <br />Proposal to the Minnesota Community Foundation <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />