12/20/2006 Env Bd Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Nature's Refuge DRAFT DECEMBER 14, 2006 EAW Record of Decision page 15 • The DNR comments that the project could be a candidate for implementation under the "exceptional natural resource value" provision of the Wetland Conservation Act, which allows credit for projects that restore exception natural resource values. Before the DNR would agree to the use of thes provision or permit the taking of state - listed plant species, the City would have to assure us that it would put in place adequate regulatory and management mechanisms to protect and sustain these resource values well into the future. Other • The DNR notes that the project will result I the removal of a significant amount of wood from the site. Depending on the condition of the wood, the developer may elect to market it as sawlog, landscaping material, firewood, or bio -fuel for the production of energy. The DNR strongly recommends that the City contact the DNR for advice on this subject. Response: The City will convey this advice to the developer and follow up on the possibilities of utilizing the wood as suggested by the DNR. • Rod Kukonen comments that buffering between existing neighborhoods and new development should be included in the design of new development so existing residents can still view natural settings from their backyards instead of a garage or shed.. Response: The City recognizes that changes on nearby property that has long been undeveloped is disturbing to many people, and the EAW acknowledges this. Buffering and greenspace are important design elements. Greenspace buffers surround all developed areas in the Nature's Refuge concept plan analyzed in the EAW, and will be included in any final design on the site. It may be unrealistic to expect that existing residents will not see any evidence of new homes on new development sites. • Frederick and Melanie Hedervare comment that it is inaccurate to call the project a `conservation development'. They comment that the developer is trying to avoid an environmental impact study by proposing a number of units just under the number that would make an environmental impact study mandatory. They comment that the City should abide by the growth limits that are on the books.