Laserfiche WebLink
• Modeling must conform to Technical Release #20 of the U.S. Department of <br />Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and subsequent guidance, <br />and composite curve numbers may not include directly connected impervious <br />surface (Paragraph 3(a)(i)). <br />• The critical 100 -year precipitation events are explicitly defined as the 24 -hour <br />rainfall and the 10 -day snowmelt (Paragraph 3(a)(iii)). <br />• Stormwater modeling for the peak flow and volume criteria need only consider <br />the two -year and 100 -year critical events, and not the one -year event <br />(Paragraph 4(i)). <br />Also, application submittal requirements would be amended to require soil borings in <br />the locations of all proposed stormwater management facilities (Paragraph 4(d)). <br />G. Easement Requirements and Facility Maintenance Obligations <br />The stormwater rule presently requires an applicant to provide an easement for District <br />review and approval. The proposed rule would clarify the easement requirement <br />(Paragraph 4(m)). First, it would state clearly that a flowage easement is required over <br />the area inundated by the 100 -year, 24 -hour storm for all surface elements of the <br />stormwater system and all on -site floodplain. <br />Second, it would clarify that the easement is for the benefit of the land use authority, <br />in accordance with the nearly universal practice to require easement dedication as a <br />part of platting or municipal development approval. The District does not wish to <br />require property owners to convey duplicative easements. <br />Third, however, the rules would explicitly require that an easement on a public ditch be <br />a minimum of 33 feet on each side of centerline, and that the District's ability to <br />enforce this restriction be established. As ditch authority, the District holds right -of- <br />way for public ditch systems and must keep the area adjacent to its ditches clear so <br />that maintenance can be performed. It was widespread practice at the time the <br />District's public systems were established, early in the previous century, for right -of- <br />way to be set at 66 feet (four rods) on centerline for maintenance access. At this time, <br />some landowners may not be mindful of this constraint. The rule would provide a <br />reminder. <br />12 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />