My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2014 1:07:39 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 9:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2007
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. RULE D: EROSION CONTROL PLANS <br />The present rule requires an approved erosion control plan and District permit for <br />"development, redevelopment or additions to an existing site" (Section 2). The terms <br />"development" and "redevelopment," in turn, are defined, broadly, to include all "land - <br />disturbing activity." This expansive language has created ambiguity, particularly in the <br />case of certain minor land- and vegetation- disturbing activities. <br />The District is proposing to replace this with a more definite standard that would <br />require an erosion control permit for the stockpiling or movement of 50 cubic yards or <br />more of erosive material or the disturbance of 5,000 square feet or more of soil or <br />vegetation (Section 2). Ordinary farming activity would be excepted. <br />These thresholds are one fairly common set of thresholds and, in the District's <br />perception, are fairly well calculated to exempt minor activities but still require careful <br />attention to some projects of limited scope, such as single - family house construction <br />or substantial house additions, that still can cause significant harm if exposed soils are <br />not managed thoughtfully. <br />Further proposed changes are primarily to emphasize that both limiting erosion and <br />limiting movement of sediments from disturbed sites are principal goals of erosion <br />control plans. Several changes would clarify the existing requirements or tighten them <br />in specific ways. In addition, the erosion control rule would be bolstered with the <br />addition of inspection specifications and requirements and a stronger link to the <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency- administered construction program. <br />The rule would require a property owner to comply with the NPDES construction permit <br />for the development (Section 5). The construction permit is administered by the <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which has a limited ability to be vigilant as to local <br />activity. The effect of this provision would be to give RCWD inspectors the ability to <br />inspect for and respond to site control practices at odds with the NPDES permit. <br />Other proposed changes include the following: <br />• The erosion control plan would need to identify staging areas so that erosion <br />control protections for those areas can be property evaluated (Paragraph 4(f)). <br />• The present rule exempts certain activities from the requirement of an erosion <br />control plan, namely industrial, commercial and multifamily residential <br />14 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.