My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2007
>
07/25/2007 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2014 1:07:39 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 9:23:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
07/25/2007
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />VIII. RULE G: BRIDGES AND CULVERT CROSSINGS <br />Proposed Rule G adds a clarification with respect to crossings or culverts on public <br />ditch systems (Section 3). The present rule requires structures to preserve hydraulic <br />capacity "equivalent [to the] existing condition." Benefited lands draining to a ditch <br />system, generally speaking, have a legal right to the hydraulic capacity corresponding <br />to the ditch as originally constructed. This may or may not correspond to the "existing <br />condition." For example, a culvert being replaced may have been installed erroneously <br />at an elevation above the as- constructed profile. Under state law, the owner of a <br />culvert or other crossing structure is responsible to ensure its structure does not <br />obstruct a public ditch and must bear the cost to remove an obstruction. <br />At the same time, if much time has passed since it last was necessary to reestablish <br />the full as- constructed profile, the details of this profile may not be immediately <br />available to the District as ditch authority, or the permittee. The District undertakes <br />formal proceedings to establish this official profile when necessary for larger -scale <br />hydraulic or hydrologic work within the contributing area of a ditch system, but these <br />proceedings and the engineering investigations on which they are based can be time <br />consuming and expensive. Accordingly, the District cannot perform this work for each <br />culvert crossing that is proposed. <br />Where the Board of Managers has not established the official profile, the District's <br />practice has been to advise the permittee of this and to state in the permit that the <br />permittee bears the risk that the structure later may be found to be an obstruction <br />within the meaning of the ditch law. The proposed rule would state this explicitly, to <br />ensure the applicant understands the risk it will assume, and - in the event it is later <br />found that the structure lies above the official profile -- to protect benefited lands <br />from a claim that the crossing structure was approved by the ditch authority and <br />therefore not subject to the ditch authority's power to direct removal. <br />IX. RULE H: SHORELAND DEVELOPMENT <br />The Shoreline Development rule has been entirely deleted, reflecting the effective <br />coverage of this area by municipal shoreland ordinances. <br />X. RULE I: DRAINAGE SYSTEMS <br />• <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.