My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/12/1999 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1999
>
04/12/1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2014 3:10:36 PM
Creation date
8/11/2014 12:15:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/12/1999
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />March 10, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br />Mr. Quigly stated that the majority of homes built in the development will be priced <br />above $250,000. The number of builders allowed in the development has not yet been <br />set. He stated most builders will purchase a block of lots. At this time he anticipates <br />approximately six builders within the development. He added he does have control over <br />the architectural design. <br />Mr. Deppard stated residents in the 1st and 2nd phase are concerned about low priced <br />homes within the development. He asked about money being set aside for parks when a <br />development goes in. He expressed concern regarding a park being developed for the <br />first two phases. He asked if the 1st and 2nd phase homeowners will be part of the <br />homeowners association and have to pay dues. <br />Mr. Smyser stated the homeowners association will address ownership and stewardship <br />of the open space. The park and trails will be owned by the City. Park equipment that is <br />put in will be determined by the Park Board and input from the neighborhood when the <br />neighborhood is built up. He added that park funding does come from land dedication or <br />cash dedication from residential and industrial development. <br />Ms. Wyland noted that if a cash dedication is mad <br />not set aside for a particular park. When devel <br />Park Board will hold neighborhood meetings <br />The 8 acre park in phase III will be for thehol <br />not be responsible for the park land. <br />laced in the General Fund and <br />stantially completed, the <br />e . ow the park is developed. <br />a. The homeowners association will <br />Mr. Deppard asked if funds fro <br />that if property taxes are goin <br />indicated she was unsure <br />s go to the parks. The neighborhood feels <br />. ey should have a park. Ms. Wyland <br />s go to fund parks. <br />Mr. Deppard stated he is con + about too many builders leading to a large mix of <br />style. He asked the developer keep the number of builders to a limit. He stated there is a <br />lot of freeway noise in the area and asked if the City or developer can do something about <br />it. <br />Mr. Smyser addressed some concerns of the residents. He stated the number of homes <br />planned in this development is fewer than was originally planned. He stated that other <br />conservation subdivisions around the country have shown the lots selling at equal or <br />higher than standard subdivision price because of the open space. He stated this project <br />was put together with the City's environmental consultants and they feel the plan protects <br />a larger part of the environment. He stated he will discuss a buffer for noise with the <br />developer in the next stage. <br />Ms. Tracy Kuny, 6706 Clearwater Drive, stated she was one of the first buyers in phase I. <br />She stated the billboard on Otter Lake Drive advertised executive homesites. She stated <br />she was shocked when phase II was developed. She indicated residents are concerned <br />about the changes that occur midway through development. She asked if there is a way to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.