My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/26/1998 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1998
>
01/26/1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 1:33:58 PM
Creation date
8/18/2014 11:47:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/26/1998
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GWI. Other communities may also submit their own information demonstrating high peak flow <br />rates and groundwater infiltration rates for specific project areas. <br />Priority ranking will first be given for those communities having an identified I/1 Goal, then <br />secondly to those communities which were characterized in the "Systemwide Infiltration/Inflow <br />Evaluation" report as having high wet weather peak flow ratios. Priority ranking will also be <br />given to those communities which were characterized as having both potentially excessive rain <br />dependent I/1 (RDI/I) and groundwater infiltration (GWI). Attached is Exhibit A, containing a <br />listing of all communities served by the MDS, ranked by wet weather peak ratios with those <br />having identified I/I goals given priority over those communities having no identified goals. Also <br />attached is Exhibit B which identifies those communities having potentially excessive RD/I and <br />GWI in the 1992 Systemwide I/1 Study. <br />Priority ranking will also be given for those communities located within the service areas of the <br />Blue Lake, Metropolitan, and Stillwater wastewater treatment facilities. These treatment facilities <br />were identified in the "Systemwide Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation" study, as benefiting most from <br />1/I removal. <br />Loan recipients will need to demonstrate that they already have an understanding of the source of <br />the I/I and how it can be effectively reduced. Peak rates of inflow have a greater impact on <br />metropolitan wastewater facilities than the long term effect from average rates of groundwater <br />infiltration. Therefore, projects designed to immediately reduce peak rates of inflow will receive <br />higher priority than those designed to eliminate the average rate of groundwater infiltration. <br />Loan applicants will need to estimate the annualized volume of I/I targeted for removal by the <br />project, and will need to provide the basis of the estimate. <br />After completion of the project, the Community will be responsible for certifying that the project <br />has maintained its intended purpose of 1/I reduction. As part of the loan application, the <br />Community is requested to propose the method for certifying the project. The method of <br />certification will be reviewed, negotiated and included in the agreement. Two such methods of <br />certification would be to document the condition of the project by means of televised inspections <br />or by visual inspections. The certification shall be signed by an Engineer registered in the state of <br />Minnesota. <br />The general criteria are summarized below. Higher priority rankings will be assigned for projects <br />characterized by items from the top of this list. Lower priority rankings will be associated with <br />items from the bottom of the list. <br />Proposed Project Ranking Criteria for Loans <br />(Descending Order of Priority) <br />Estimated total of 1/I reduction as result of project is either greater than 30 MGY, between <br />15 MGY and 30 MGY, or between 5 MGY and 15 MGY <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.