Laserfiche WebLink
MAY. -20' 98 (WED) 14 :34 <br />Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 13, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br />* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** <br />TEL :612 421 9511 P.006 <br />He stated he has not yet seen anything platted, and expressed concern over the amount o f _ <br />trees that would have to be destroyed. <br />Chair Schaps explained that approving the plan before the detailed proposal is standard. <br />Missy Trittin, 6221 Laurene, stated that the area is beautiful and she would like to see the <br />trees and the wildlife remain the same. She explained that she has seen 22 different <br />species of birds, including a very rare woodpecker. Destroying all of the trees would be a <br />terrible waste. <br />Mr. Sampair said that all the comments from the concerned residents were very good and <br />had been taken into consideration. He pointed out that the total area of the proposed <br />development, divided by the minimum requirements, met the R-1X standards. The <br />frontages would not meet the R -1X standards. He stated that the proposed development <br />would improve the area and the flow of the land. He said that some of the existing homes <br />are small, and the new proposed homes would be consistent with the neighborhood. <br />Sewer and water does currently go through the neighborhood, and the proposed plan far <br />exceeds the minimums of Fox Trace, a development close by. <br />Mr. Trehus stated that he believed the proposed development was not consistent with the <br />area and very much out of character with the current neighborhood. <br />Mr. Dunn said that he had visited the area several times so he could draw a fair conclusion <br />regarding the issue. He was very impressed with the area. The homes were very well <br />kept and maintained and he would like to see it stay that way. He stated that the sewer <br />and water on Linda Avenue was done by chance, not choice. He felt the street would not <br />be improved to residential quality and destroying the area for development was unfair and <br />unreasonable. Mr. Dunn stated that meeting required conditions was only part of the big <br />picture and he was very skeptical regarding the proposed drainage plans. The <br />Comprehensive Plan segments part of the City to remain rural and the City has an <br />opportunity to do so with this area. He noted that a citizens survey indicated the majority <br />of the citizens would like to preserve rural land and wildlife where there is an opportunity <br />to do so. <br />Mr. Schilling stated that Collova Builders and the citizens had both made good points. He <br />felt it was not a good idea to put so many houses in one area The developer had <br />increased the square footage of the proposed homes, but the issue of quality also had to be <br />addressed. The neighborhood had compromised agreeing to the R-1X zoning. Mr. <br />Schilling hoped to pursue that option. <br />Mr. Corson stated that the R-1X zoning was more appropriate in this area that R -1. He <br />complimented Collova Builders for working so closely with the residents. <br />Mr. Johnson agreed that R-1X would be more appropriate than R-1, due to the nature of <br />the street, vegetation, and wildlife in the area. <br />