07/13/1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 13,1997 Consideration of Removing the House and Garage at 1410 Canfield Road - Building Inspector Jackson explained that last year the home at 1410 Canfield Road was substantially damaged by fire. He showed photographs of the subject structure. Mr. Kluegel contacted the property owner, Gregory Dufeck, regarding his intentions for the property. At that time Mr. Dufeck had no definitive plans or timetable for removal or rebuilding of the structure. Mr. Jackson stated that over the past year the City has received numerous complaints about the unsightliness of the property, the potential hazard the property poses to the public, and the presence of unlicensed, inoperable vehicles on the property. Additionally, law enforcement officials have been dispatched on several occasions to investigate reports of unauthorized activity on the premises. On a recent visit to the property, it was observed that the building was not secured and it appeared to be in danger of imminent collapse. If the building is to be restored, the City will require a state- licensed structural engineer to determine the scope of repairs before a permit can be issued. An order for removal was presented for Council's consideration. Staff recommended that Council approve the order to remove the building pursuant to Statutes 463.15 through 463.261, and/or allow Mr. Dufeck to present the following at the October 27, 1997 Council meeting: (1) a licensed engineer's report specifying required repairs; (2) a performance bond for restoration of the structure; (3) a completed building permit application; and (4) a timetable for restoration. Council Member Kuether asked if Mr. Dufeck was notified that this issue would be before Council at this time. Mr. Jackson indicated that Mr. Dufeck had been notified. Mr. Dufeck addressed Council, indicating his intent to rebuild the damaged structure, explaining that certain personal issues have delayed his ability to restore his property. He requested time within which to comply with the recommendations enumerated above. Council Member Kuether asked about the time element proposed within the Order for Removal. Attorney Hawkins explained that the Order establishes a 20 -day deadline by which the owner is required to have the damaged structure removed from his property. He added that should Council feel additional time is warranted for Mr. Dufeck to take action, it should table this matter accordingly. Council Member Kuether reiterated the hazard the property currently presents. Mayor Landers asked if it would be reasonable to request fencing of the property during an extended period prior to Council action on this matter. The consensus was to resecure the building, as a fence would be added expense to no apparent avail. Council Member Kuether asked if Council could approve the Order for Removal and then rescind the Order as of the October 27, 1997 meeting date in the event Mr. Dufeck presents sufficient information at that time indicating that he will be able to restore the premises to safe condition. Attorney Hawkins stated that Council could follow that course of action. Mayor Landers indicated the importance for constant monitoring of the property by Mr. Dufeck. 9