Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM 4E <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: David Ahrens, Public Works DirectorlCity Engineer <br />DATE: August 10, 1998 <br />TOPIC: Resolution No 98 -127, Approve Payment No 4 (final) and <br />Change Orders No 1 & 2, 1997 Wear Course and Trail Paving <br />Project <br />BACKKGROUNC; <br />The Contractor for the 1997 Wear Course and Trail Paving Project is requesting <br />City approval of payment no 4 (final) in the amount of $15,186.04 :including <br />change orders 1 and 2. All necessary lien waivers and Withholding Affidavits <br />have been submitted, to staff thereby meeting the requirements of the <br />Construction Contract. <br />The project included the paving of certain trails throughout the. City and <br />construction of a trail along the north side of Aqua Lane. Also, wear course <br />paving was done in new developments. The final contract amount is <br />summarized as follows: <br />Original Bid Amount $185,665.25 <br />Change Order No 1 $ 15,234.33 <br />Change Order No 2 $ 14.122.50 <br />Final Contract Amount $215,022.08 <br />The attached memorandums from John Powell, TKDA, Inc., discuss the change <br />orders in detail. Change Order No 1 is a compensating change order for <br />quantity overrurfsiunderruns. The trail construction along Aqua Lane resulted in <br />quantity increases as a result of poor subbase materials that were exposed <br />during construction. <br />Change Order No. 2 is a result of the construction observer noting that the <br />existing rubberized seal used on manhole adjustment rings and castings was not <br />sufficient to properly seal the rings and casting. Since the rings and casting are <br />areas where a significant amount of infiltration can occur or sand washing <br />between the rings, staff directed the contractor to install additional rubberized <br />seals to prevent any infiltration of water. <br />In both change order cases, the problems encountered were not anticipated and <br />it was only after work had begun and the materials exposed that the construction <br />observer noted problems that required correction. If the design of the project <br />had anticipated the poor soils and deficient seals, the resulting contract amount <br />would be nearly equal to the final amount noted above. <br />