My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/24/1998 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1998
>
08/24/1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 11:48:07 AM
Creation date
8/20/2014 12:30:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/24/1998
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This case involves a request from Mr. James Dougherty of 147 Smoketree Lane <br />for a variance to allow the construction of a third stall on his garage with living <br />space. above. The proposed addition will be 14' in width, 24 ' in depth and <br />located 24' from the side property line at the front of the addition and 28' from <br />side property line at the rear of the addition. The property is Zoned Rt Single, <br />Family and is considered a comer lot, therefore the setback requirement is 30'. <br />Mr. Dougherty is, theref e, requesting a variance of 2' on the rear and 6' on the <br />front. As a slight alternative, Mr. Dougherty could reduce the proposed addition <br />by 2', thereby meeting the setback requirement on the rear of the addition and <br />requiring only a 4' variance on the front of the addition. In either event, it does <br />not appear that a site distance/visibility problem would occur with the proposed <br />construction. The <br />City Engineer has view the site and would concur with this observation. For P <br />Z information, bo <br />Smoketree Lane and Grey Squirrel Road are city streets. <br />Circumstances are such involving this case that the applicant was able to obtain <br />a buil ding permit and ready the site for the pr • ° ed construction as explained in <br />the attached letter. When he called for a footing inspection it was determined <br />that he was too close to the side property line. Thus the variance request. <br />The criteria <br />valuating a variance is as follows: <br />A. That the property In quest cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official c ntrols. t e proposed addition would be compromised if required to meet <br />the strict letter of the ordinance as the bedroorns and garage ammo would be reduced n n size. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.