My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2009-052 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2009
>
2009-052 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 8:56:23 PM
Creation date
8/27/2014 10:40:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
07/27/2009
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
09-52
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Xcel Energy Variance, page 2 <br /> FINDINGS <br /> ` In considering all requests for Variance or appeal and in taking subsequent action, the <br /> City shall make a finding of fact: <br /> a. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls. <br /> These parcels are completely surrounded by adjoining private property; and <br /> would not be able to be developed as usable parcels due to the sizes or lack <br /> of road frontage. <br /> b. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to <br /> his property not created by the landowner. <br /> The physical shape, location and isolated nature of the parcels prevent most <br /> private uses. <br /> C. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable <br /> use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br /> Economic considerations are not a major factor in this proposal, the intent is <br /> to minimize the applicant's holdings and center an easement directly over the <br /> existing transmission lines. <br /> d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any <br /> special privilege that would be denied by this ordinance to other lands, <br /> structures, or buildings in the same district. <br /> There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one. Land <br /> locked parcels owned and operated almost exclusively for utility purposes <br /> would receive the same consideration. <br /> e. That the proposed actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> ordinance. <br /> Combining these properties with the adjacent landowner's parcels will in no <br /> way violate the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance. <br /> PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD <br /> On July 8, the Planning and Zoning Board unanimously recommended approval of this <br /> request. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. The properties must be divided through the minor subdivision process. <br /> 4o 2. When ownership of these properties changes hands the new owner(s) are <br /> required to combine them with adjacent parcels to avoid creating a new parcel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.