Laserfiche WebLink
• 3. The ordinance defines "Accessory Building" as a portion of the principal building <br />or a detached structure on the same lot which is used for an accessory use. <br />4. Section 3, Subdivision 4.D Accessory Buildings and Structures, Subpart 2 <br />establishes standards for "Sport Courts ". <br />5. Section 3, Subdivision 4.D Accessory Buildings and Structures, Subpart 9 <br />establishes standards for the maximum number, size, and height of accessory <br />buildings allowed in an individual parcel according to lot size and residential <br />district. The maximum accessory building square footage allowed within the R -X <br />district is 3,600 square feet. <br />The Schwartz's argue that based on the literal interpretation of the ordinance that with <br />the addition of the proposed "Sport Court" Mr. Smiths addition would exceed the <br />accessory building square footage allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. <br />In accordance with Section 2, Subdivision 4, subpart B of the zoning ordinance the City <br />Council acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall consider the application <br />for appeal and render a decision by resolution. Additionally, the permit application has <br />been stayed, in accordance with the ordinance provisions until a decision has been <br />reached by the council. <br />110 ANALYSIS <br />• <br />As discussed by the Schwartz's, the literal interpretation of the ordinance requirements <br />would suggest that the Sport Court, as proposed, is an accessory use and by definition <br />an accessory building subject to the accessory building size limitations of the zoning <br />ordinance. However, staff is of the opinion that the literal interpretation does not reflect <br />the intent of the ordinance requirements. The intent of the ordinance requirements was <br />to regulate the placement of outdoor recreation facilities such as tennis courts, <br />basketball courts and similar uses. <br />Additionally, no consideration was given to regulating the use of recreational areas <br />within the principal structure. Single family detached dwellings are a permitted use <br />within the R -X, Rural Executive Zoning District. The term dwelling is defined in the <br />ordinance as follows: <br />Dwelling. A structure or portion thereof which is used exclusively for human <br />habitation. <br />The proposed recreational area is a habitable part of the existing residence and is not <br />considered any different from other primary uses of the residence. Staff finds it difficult <br />to differentiate the sport court from other room designations common within dwellings <br />such as a billiards room, office /den or home theatre. The Schwartz's argue that <br />"Having this significant mass of structure with accessory use next to our property, <br />running several hundred feet along our side yard, is an obtrusive use that the spirit of <br />