Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Registered Land Survey <br />North Road Area <br />page 3 <br />recorded. Whether the City or County actually own the roads would need to be <br />determined, but this is not a vital point for now. <br />Lexington Park Lake View <br />(platted 1946) <br />proposed <br />Registered Land <br />Survey Tract <br />ownership <br />Lot 11, Block 8 <br />Tracts C & D <br />Clingingsmith & Fletcher <br />Lot 12, Block 8 <br />Tract A & B <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />Lot 9, Block 10 <br />Tracts I & K <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />Lot 10, Block 10 <br />Tract L <br />Clingingsmith & Fletcher <br />Lot 11, Block 10 <br />Tract M <br />Clingingsmith & Fletcher <br />Clingingsmith & Fletcher <br />Clingingsmith & Fletcher <br />Lot 12, Block 10 <br />Tract N <br />Lot 13, Block 10 <br />Tract 0 <br />Lot 14, Block 10 <br />Tract P <br />Clingingsmith & Fletcher <br />portion of Sunrise Drive <br />Tract J <br />Anoka County or Lino Lakes <br />portion of Sunrise Drive <br />and portion of North Road <br />Tract F & G <br />Anoka County or Lino Lakes <br />portion of North Road <br />Tract E <br />Anoka County <br />portion of North Road <br />Tract H <br />Anoka County <br />Land Owners' Agreement on the RLS: On a plat, the signatures of all with interest in <br />the property must sign the plat or sign a separate consent to plat document. The RLS <br />does not have a signature page and the RLS is being proposed by the City of Circle Pines, <br />which is not the property owner of the land in question. The situation is different from a <br />typical plat. Our city attorney discussed this question with the Anoka County Examiner <br />of Titles. The answer is rather surprising. <br />There is no requirement in state statute that a property owner must sign off on or even <br />agree to a registered land survey on his property. While the proposed RLS seems to be <br />splitting property into separate tracts, it is in effect only defining an existing easement by <br />making it a separate tract of land. According to the City Attorney's discussion with the <br />Examiner of Titles, this does not require property owner agreement. <br />Nonetheless, in the interest of fairness, we wanted the existing owners to be aware of the <br />proposed RLS. Staff met with Jan Clingingsmith and Darwin Fletcher to ensure they <br />understood the RLS. <br />Northern Right of Way Line: Several of the attached drawings show the northern road <br />easement /right of way line running in a southwest to northeast diagonal across the <br />westernmost area of the RLS. You can see that the line appears in different places on <br />different drawings. We asked Circle Pines to have this clarified. The RLS was revised to <br />include this right of way boundary as the line separating Tracts A and B. <br />