Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />Draft Draft 04 -18 -2005 Draft <br />property. This policy applies to all streets that are the responsibility of the <br />City. <br />2. The maximum assessment rate for the reconstruction of previously paved <br />streets shall be determined according to Section VIII of this policy. <br />3. Assessments shall not exceed any of the following: <br />(a) the special benefit to the property being assessed; <br />(b) the total project cost. <br />(c) the maximum assessment rate. <br />4. Project cost includes both direct construction costs, including land <br />acquisition, and all indirect costs such as engineering, legal, fiscal and <br />administration. <br />Method of Assessment <br />The City Council, shall assess street improvements on the basis of a Lot /Unit <br />assessment. The Lot/Unit assessment shall be calculated as follows: <br />1. Rural, Single Family, Two Family Residential Districts. <br />(a) One half of the total cost of the improvements shall be divided by <br />the total front footage for the improvement. The quotient of this <br />shall be the Calculated Assessment Rate. <br />(b) <br />The Calculated Assessment Rate shall be compared to the <br />Maximum Assessment Rate, as provided for under this policy and <br />the lesser of the two shall be the Assessment Rate. <br />(c) The Assessment Rate shall be multiplied by the minimum required <br />lot width of the respective zoning district that applies. The product <br />of this shall be the Lot/Unit Assessment <br />(d) Exceptions. <br />Where parcels in Rural Zoning Districts have less than the <br />minimum required lot width they shall be evaluated under <br />the lot width requirements of the most applicable single <br />family district. <br />ii. Where parcels within zoning districts have less than the <br />minimum required lot width of the respective district the <br />Lot /Unit Assessment shall be calculated by multiplying the <br />individual lot width by the Assessment Rate. <br />Pavement Management Policy <br />4 05/02/05 <br />-212- <br />