Laserfiche WebLink
With the revised plans dated January 5, 2006; and a condition requiring the trash enclosure to be properly <br />With <br />and screened with landscaping, staff feels that all of the above conditions are being met on this site. <br />Setback Requirements <br />Principle Building <br />Parking Lot <br />Maximum <br />Allowed <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Required <br />Proposed <br />Local Street: <br />Apollo Court <br />Jon Drive <br />74th Street <br />30 feet <br />44 feet <br />178 feet <br />259 feet <br />15 feet <br />22 feet <br />178 feet <br />103 feet <br />Side Yard: <br />South Property Line <br />East Property Line <br />10 feet <br />185 feet <br />168 feet <br />5 feet <br />105 feet <br />15 feet <br />The proposed building meets or exceeds all of the setback requirements for the LI (Light Industrial) zoning <br />district; including the minimum setback from residential districts of 75 feet and the setback requirement <br />between buildings of the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. (Even if the 45 foot maximum <br />height was used the setback between buildings would be maxed out at 45 feet, this proposal is well in excess of <br />45 feet from the buildings to the east and the south. <br />Building Materials <br />Oro meet the recently approved architectural design standards for the city, the applicant is proposing a mix of <br />brick/masonry materials and EIFS. Ordinance Number 07 -05 which revised the commercial design guidelines <br />requires the following limitations on EIFS type wall finishes: <br />Wall Face <br />Elevation <br />EIFS <br />Maximum <br />Allowed <br />Proposed <br />Front <br />South <br />30% <br />20% <br />Sides & Rear <br />South <br />60% <br />56% <br />West <br />60% <br />54% <br />North <br />60% <br />56% <br />East <br />60% <br />55% <br />These percentages clearly conform to ordinance 07 -05. Furthermore, the EIFS is no closer than 7 feet 4 inches <br />to the ground, which clearly exceeds the minimum of 4 feet required by the new ordinance. <br />Revisions to the architectural elevations have clearly addressed staff and the Planning and Zoning Board's <br />concerns with the definition of a base, middle, and top to the building. <br />