Laserfiche WebLink
St. Paul Regional Water Services, page 4 <br />• <br />Council Member Stoltz introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 06 -182 <br />APPROVING VARIANCES TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOT AREA, LOT WIDTH, LOT <br />DEPTH AND ROAD FRONTAGE FOR THE ST. PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES. <br />WHEREAS, a request has been submitted to the City for the approval of a minor subdivision which requires <br />variances for lot area, lot width, lot depth, and road frontage, and <br />WHEREAS, review and approvals of variances are governed by state statutes and City ordinances, and <br />WHEREAS, the sites described in the legal descriptions in Attachment A, and <br />WHEREAS, the Lino Lakes City Council makes the following findings: <br />• <br />• <br />f. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by <br />the official controls. <br />g. <br />These parcels are completely surrounded by the lake, right of way, or adjoining private <br />property; and would not be able to be developed as usable parcels due to the sizes or lack of <br />road frontage. <br />That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The physical shape, location and isolated nature of the parcels prevent use for most anything <br />except for lake access for the adjoining property owners. <br />h. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use for the property <br />exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />Economic considerations is not a major factor in this proposal, the intent is to minimize the <br />applicant's lakeshore holdings for the future. <br />i. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that would <br />be denied by this ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. <br />There are very few other situations that can be compared to this one. Land locked parcels <br />owned and operated almost exclusively for public purposes would receive the same <br />consideration. <br />