Laserfiche WebLink
5. Utilizing the existing private drive along Outlot A as the cartway is the least <br />damaging and disruptive location for the cartway. It would be unreasonable and <br />more disruptive to require another bridge to be built over the channel between <br />Petitioner's two parcels. <br />6. The cartway shall be the full width of the existing drive, plus an area to the north <br />of the drive for access to the Land, as further described in Exhibit B. <br />7. All costs incurred by the City shall be deducted from Petitioner's escrow and the <br />remainder, if any, returned to Petitioner. Any and all additional costs shall be paid <br />by Petitioner. <br />8. It is not in the public's interest to expend City funds on the cartway, either for <br />initial construction or ongoing maintenance. <br />9. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 435.37, subdivision 1(c), Petitioner shall <br />pay the City $ 51,653.75 in damages for the establishment of the cartway. Said <br />damages shall be forwarded to the HOA. Damages must be paid to the City before <br />the cartway is opened. <br />10. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 435.37, subdivisions 1(d) and 2, all costs of <br />construction and maintenance of the small access area between the north edge of <br />the existing private drive and the south boundary of the Land, as illustrated in <br />Exhibit B, shall be the sole responsibility of Petitioner. <br />11. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 43 5.57, subdivision 2, Petitioner shall pay <br />the HOA for maintenance costs directly related to maintenance of the existing <br />private drive to the extent it serves as the cartway, as shown on Exhibit B. The <br />remainder of the existing private drive shall continue to be maintained by the <br />HOA at its sole cost. Petitioner shall pay 1/6 of the maintenance costs directly <br />attributable to the bridge, including the road surface of the bridge, and that portion <br />of the roadway underlying the cartway. To the extent maintenance costs are <br />invoiced for the road as whole, Petitioner shall pay 1.54% of the total cost. Said <br />payments shall be made at the same time and in the same manner as members of <br />the HOA are required to make such payments for the same maintenance costs. <br />12. Beginning two years after the filing of the award, the total damage amount of <br />$51,653.75 shall be subject to increases due to inflation as measured by the online <br />Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index Inflation <br />4 <br />