My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2012-109 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2012
>
2012-109 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2014 10:44:10 AM
Creation date
9/25/2014 9:35:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
11/26/2012
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
12-109
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
St. Louis County properties not added to tax rolls cost others money - TwinCities.com Page 4 of 6 <br />Durward sent her report to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, which ultimately oversees <br />disciplinary actions against assessors, saying that in addition to missing properties, "he just doesn't <br />know how to do the work." <br />"He has no experience in assessment of commercial and resort properties," she wrote. "Regardless of <br />the reasons, the assessment service is not getting done at an acceptable level, and in many cases, not <br />getting done at all." <br />She asked the state to "initiate action" against Vidmar for failing to comply with his duties and state <br />law. <br />That didn't happen. <br />John Hagen, director of the Department of Revenue's Property Tax division, which received <br />Durward's 2004 report, was asked why no action was taken against Vidmar. <br />"I can't recall," Hagen said. "I honestly cannot recall exactly how that was resolved." <br />Some staff members from the Department of Revenue did come to St. Louis County and met with <br />county assessors and some township board members, Hintz said, but they never met with Vidmar. <br />"What they said when they left was they wanted to meet with Rick, and they wanted to schedule some <br />audit meetings with them, and they wanted to sit in on those audits," Hintz said. "I did get those <br />scheduled, but then Revenue said they couldn't make it, so they never followed through on it. So it <br />basically ended there." <br />Monacelli, who has been county recorder since the late 1980s, said that when he took over as head of <br />the assessment department in August 2010, he asked the state why no action was taken against <br />Vidmar. <br />"They said it was a violation of county policy, not state statute," said Monacelli. "I don't see how not <br />doing the work or not getting the work done is a violation of county policy." <br />'A TERRIBLE SITUATION' <br />Cities and townships continued to hire Vidmar, and he continued to undervalue or miss <br />improvements, according to county audits and other records. <br />"The problem never went away," Hintz said. "Along the line, Rick had a couple of health issues...but <br />the point is that doesn't excuse the assessor from doing the work. That's one of the dangers when all <br />these jurisdictions hire a local assessor. You put all your eggs into one basket, and if that person has <br />some health issues, you still have an obligation to make sure the assessment is completed. Whereas, <br />with the county staff, if someone goes down, the work is still going to get done." <br />In e -mails he sent to Hintz and other county assessors, Vidmar blamed his health for not meeting for <br />audits. <br />http: / /www.twincities. com/localnews /ci_ 20264312 /st- louis- county- properties- not - added -t... 11/19/2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.