2013-074 Council Resolution - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

• • CITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION 13 -74 CONSENT TO CONDUCT DRAINAGE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANOKA COUNTY DITCHES 53 -62, UNDER THE WATERSHED LAW WHEREAS, Rice Creek Watershed District ( "RCWD ") is the drainage authority for Anoka County Ditches (ACD) 53 -62 (the "Drainage System "); and WHEREAS, RCWD performs repair and maintenance activities on the Drainage System, including current repair proceedings for ACD 53 -62; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 103D.621 Subd. 4, grants RCWD the authority to undertake proceedings related to the Drainage Systems in accordance with the Watershed Law (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D) rather than the Drainage Code (Minnesota Statutes Chapter103E), subject to concurrence by city councils and town boards where the Drainage Systems are located; WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 11 -35, on March 14, 2011, the City Council previously consented to the conduct of drainage proceedings for ACD 10 -22 -32 under the Watershed Law; WHEREAS, RCWD has requested concurrence from City of Lino Lakes to conduct the necessary proceedings related to the Drainage System in the City of Lino Lakes under the Watershed Law, rather than the Drainage Code; WHEREAS, the purpose of conducting proceedings under the Watershed Law is to provide consistent management of all drainage systems under RCWD management, comprehensive wetland management, and appropriate administration of resource management plans; and WHEREAS, conducting the proceedings under the Watershed Law will facilitate flexibility in financing the recommended repair option. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lino Lakes City Council, in accordance with Minnesota Statute 103D.621 Subd. 4., consents to the Rice Creek Watershed District's request to conduct proceedings for Anoka County Ditches 53 -62 under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D. Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 10th day of June, 2013. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member O' Donnell and was duly seconded by Council Member ; , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor ther O'Donnell, Roeser, Rafferty, Stoesz, The following voted against same: none ATTEST: e Bartell, City Clerk� e Rein