My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/03/2014 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
10/03/2014 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2014 1:59:56 PM
Creation date
10/3/2014 12:42:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
01/31/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 <br />Asleson stated that the standard recommendations were applicable, in addition to <br />concerns over Lots 4 and 5, and Lot 9 mitigation. <br />Mach urged a balance of development with wetland mitigation. <br />Asleson suggested that it would be good to address the water quality issues and <br />encourage the use of natural plants with unique high quality rather than a monoculture. <br />Grundhofer expressed concem over the pines in the southwest on Lots 9 and 10. <br />Asleson responded that the pine trees on Lots 1, and 8 to 10 had several trees that were <br />too large to move. He noted that pines are not native here, but are planted sometimes to <br />enhance the winter scene. The project was going to the Planning and Zoning Board next. <br />D. City Hall Park QWEST Communications Tower — Asleson introduced the format of <br />the Project Tracking Form, then addressed the project stating that the proposed tower <br />would hold the hockey light as well. The lease money would then go into the general <br />fund. <br />Kukonen asked if lights were required if the tower w in use in the future. <br />Asleson stated that the dimensions were lights I50et, 1 oot tower, and a need for <br />25 x 25 square foot plot of land. <br />Grundhofer stated that the pole would be <br />put further back on the property. Asleson <br />location of the pole nearby other s <br />Donlin suggested that ano <br />Asleson answered that <br />d recommended that it could be <br />o ' d that the goal was to keep the <br />y present. <br />ower could be used instead of erecting a new one. <br />tower in the specified location. <br />Mach asked if there was a pl <br />was being done by Rick DeG <br />future towers. Asleson responded that a tower study <br />er. <br />Donlin urged that the tower not be erected at the proposed location, due to a nearby <br />eagle's nest and duck pass. Asleson stated that the area needed to be rezoned from Rural <br />to Public/Semi- Public. <br />Grundhofer stated that the citizens needed to be notified. <br />Donlin inquired as to whether the DNR had studied the impact. She noted that the local <br />hunt club recommended that the tower not be placed at the proposed location. Trehus <br />concurred. <br />Asleson stated that the location was chosen due to the communication radius necessary. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.