My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/31/2001 Env Bd Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2001
>
01/31/2001 Env Bd Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2014 2:41:37 PM
Creation date
10/3/2014 12:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
01/31/2001
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 3, 2001 <br />CITIZEN COMMENTS • <br />Donlin read a letter written by Art Hawkins, a concerned resident, concerning growth of adjacent <br />communities and their impact on open spaces. He requested action on the part of the <br />Environmental Board in voicing the perspectives of the citizens of Lino Lakes in the issue of <br />proposed changes to open spaces. He urged a comprehensive plan be formulated to bring the <br />vision, the citywide survey, park plan and natural resources inventory, GIS system, the interface <br />study, and committees together. <br />APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR/VICE CHAIR <br />Trehus recommended that because Chair Lanyon was not present, the appointments be <br />temporary for the night only. The Acting Chair was Dave Mach and the Acting Vice Chair was <br />Mike Trehus. Regular appointments will be made at the January meeting. <br />PROJECT REVIEW <br />A. Dellwood LLCI N.E. Quadrant of 35W and Lake D <br />that Mr. Payton had presented this project at the last <br />and Zoning Board and City Council have discuss <br />held. The project is going through the informal <br />application. He then introduced Mr. Payton an <br />Research and Development of Ryan Com ies wh <br />concept. <br />' pdate — Wessel explained <br />g. Since then, the Planning <br />hborhood meeting has been <br />ion p ess prior to a formal <br />almquist the Vice President of <br />working on the SuperTarget <br />Mr. Palmquist explained that rec <br />primary challenge to the projec <br />were dealing with the issue <br />be managed with lanes <br />northern part of the prope <br />in the first part of July. <br />been a neighborhood meeting where the <br />g the traffic needs. TKDA and Mr. Powell <br />ental Board was assured that the traffic could <br />o discussed, was adequate buffering on the <br />ted an EAW would be done which would be finished <br />Mr. Payton presented several maps and explained that the final topographic survey has <br />been completed so more of the spatial relationships have come together. He indicated <br />that there was a small group of tamarack trees, which could be protected by a retaining <br />wall in the west. Asleson explained that the area has been disturbed more than once. He <br />noted a 1953 topographic map that showed tamaracks throughout the area. The freeway <br />went through in the 1960's and greatly impacted the tamaracks. <br />Donlin inquired what plans Target had to address the tamarack trees in the area. Mr. <br />Payton answered that the standing water is only intermittent for 48 hours in a 100 -year <br />event. He noted that there is an aquatic bench planned, with canary grass plantings to <br />reduce the presence of geese. He continued, they were waiting for the results of the soil <br />reports to determine the size of the ponds. The maps presented showed them at the <br />maximum possible size, but in all probability they would shrink. Target representatives <br />were preparing to submit the plan to the City by January 15t. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.