My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2007-074 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2007
>
2007-074 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 8:45:00 PM
Creation date
10/7/2014 12:21:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Master List Resolution
Meeting Date
05/29/2007
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
07-074
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Member Carlson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 07-74 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE LOCAL STREET SETBACK <br /> FOR THE PROPERTY AT 8020 DANUBE STREET. <br /> WHEREAS,the City has received an application for a porch addition to the dwelling at 8020 <br /> Danube Street; and <br /> WHEREAS, the development requires approval of a variance to the local street setback of 30 <br /> feet; and <br /> WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning& Zoning Board on May 9, 2007; <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, as required by Section 2, Subd. 4 of the zoning ordinance, the City Council made <br /> the following findings of fact regarding both lots: <br /> f. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls. <br /> The property is currently developed with a single family home that can easily be put <br /> to areasonable use without the addition of a porch covered with a roof structure. <br /> g. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to <br /> his property not created by the landowner. <br /> The existing structures lack of a significant entry feature and the placement of the <br /> existing home only 15 inches from the front setback are physical circumstances that <br /> were not created by the current landowner. <br /> h. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone if reasonable use <br /> for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br /> The request made by the property owner has nothing to do with economic <br /> considerations; the placement of the home on the lot when it was constructed <br /> simply prohibits the addition of the proposed covered porch under the strict <br /> enforcement of the zoning ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.