My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/25/1982 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1982
>
01/25/1982 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2014 12:00:39 PM
Creation date
10/8/2014 12:03:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
01/25/1982
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
132 <br />January 11, 1982 <br />Several of the Council members were unsure if they would be able to <br />attend and informed Mr. Schumacher that they would get back to him soon. <br />Mr. Marier moved to adjourn. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Aye. 10:30P.M <br />These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at a regular <br />meeting held on January 25, 1982. <br />hA„, 04,44:61,1„/ <br />Edna L. Sarner, Clerk- Treasurer <br />Special Council Meeting <br />January 25, 1982 - 6:00 P.M. <br />The Special Meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order <br />at 6:00 P.M., January 25, 1982 with all Council Members present. Mr. <br />Locher and Mr. Schumacher were also present. This meeting had been <br />called to discuss the Home Rule Charter with members of the Charter <br />Commission. <br />Mayor Benson asked Mr. Weible to go through the Chapters in order that <br />the Council may be familar with the provisions of this Charter and to <br />discuss their ideas for the implementation of this document. <br />Mr. Weible noted that Saasically the form of government existing had not <br />been altered. There is a provision for having copies available at City <br />Hall - the number had been left up to the City Council. <br />Mayor Benson suggested that the City Staff get some cost comparisons <br />as to copying in the offices or having the printing done prefessionally. <br />Under Chapter 3 the major difference is the time delay between intro- <br />duction, adoption and date effective on ordinances and Resolutions. <br />Mr. Marier asked what is an emergency ordinance and Mr. Weible read the <br />definition from the Charter. <br />Me Weible pointed out that Ordinances do not take effect until 30 days <br />after publication and Resolutions take effect 14 days after passage. <br />Mr. Marier asked Mr. Locher about the rules set forth on the Resolutions. <br />He has a problem separating Resolutions and Motions. <br />Mr. Weible said there are,) ways in which the Charter can be amended. <br />Mr. Marier said he understood that point - he was concerned with Sec. <br />3.08. He asked Mr. Locher if there was a constitutional law on <br />Resolutions and Mr. Locher said he didn't know. Mr. Locher felt that <br />most Attorneys have a problem in separating motions and Resolutions. <br />Mr. Schumacher had a problem with Section 3.07 in that it would appear <br />this section requires publication of the full ordinance and publication <br />of a summary. There was discussion on this requirement with no clear <br />decision being made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.