Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />Council Meeting <br />December 12, 1983 <br />143 <br />The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to <br />order at 7:00 P.M., December 12, 1983, by Mayor Benson with all <br />Council members present. Also present, Mr. Hawkins, Mr. Schumacher, <br />Mr. Wetzler, Mr. Kluegel, Chief Myhre and Mrs. Sarner. <br />NIMUTES - November 28, 1983 <br />Mr. Reinert moved to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Mr. <br />Kulaszewicz. <br />Mayor Benson noted that on page 3, under Public Hearing - Roy Stanley, <br />the motion to close the hearing had been omitted. Also, on page 6, <br />under Old Business, line two, delete the words after 'plant'. Motion <br />to approve with corrections carried unanimously. <br />DISBURSEMENTS - November 30, 1983 <br />Mr. Marier moved to approve the disbursements as presented. Seconded <br />By Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Disbursements - December 12, 1983 - Mr. Kulaszewicz moved to approve <br />the disbursements as presented. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />OPEN MIKE <br />Mrs. Pat Sorenson had requested to appear under this portion of the <br />agenda to discuss the questions she had presented to the Council at a <br />meeting previously. She apologized for not being present at the last <br />meeting. She asked Mayor Benson how he would like to handle the <br />questions - did he want them read? <br />Mayor Benson said he had prepared a statement and had been advised by <br />the Attorney not to expand on this statement and he hoped the Council <br />would heed this advise. <br />Question #1) Mayor Benson said there would be no discussion of any sort <br />of policy until after the 1st of the year. This could be discussed in <br />his State of the City address. <br />Question #2) This question - How are we going to ppy for the lawsuit <br />if we lose the case in court? Will it be through raised taxes or a <br />special assessment? <br />"Any judgement that is awarded against a municipal corporation, and <br />not covered by insurance policies of the City would be governed pursuant <br />to Minnesota Statutes S465.14. When a judgement against the City <br />is not paid at the time of the annual tax levy and unless the City has <br />otherwise provided sufficient funds to pay for the collection of such <br />tax levy, the City shall levy a tax to pay such judgement and certify <br />the same to the County Auditor along with the purpose. <br />There is no authority to collect unpaid jundgements by special <br />assessments pursuant to the City Charter or Minnesota Statute S429. <br />