Laserfiche WebLink
184 <br />Council Meeting <br />February 27, 1984 <br />Mr. MarIj.ri:. Hansen was to appear but he was not present at this <br />time. <br />Mr. Ralph Nathe of the 49 Club appeared before the Council to <br />answer questions as to the construction to be done at that <br />location. <br />Mr. Nather said the blacktopping and the fence would be installed as <br />soon as the weather allows. There was discussion on the need for the <br />fence in order to maintain an entrance to the 4 -plex. There was <br />some discussion as to the type of fence and Mr. Nathe suggested a re- <br />movable fence in order to be able to removed the snow. The Council <br />asked for a time table and Mr. Nathe agreed that this work should be <br />completed by May 15th of this year. <br />Mr. Reinert felt the change in the installation of the fence should <br />be done by motion. Mr. .Reinert moved to allow sleeves to be installed <br />for the fence post in order for the snow to be removed. Seconded by <br />MR. Marier. <br />MR. Reinert pointed out this does not mean that the posts can be re- <br />moved for snow removal and left down - the fence must be replaced <br />at once. <br />After some discussion on this matter, Mr. Mrare.r withdrew his second <br />and Mr. Reinert withdrew his motion. <br />Mr. Reinert moved that Mr. Nathe be allowed to install a fence with <br />sleeves or inserts in order for the fence to be removed when snow <br />removal is necessary. The fence to be replaced immediately after the <br />snow removal. Seconded by Mr. Marier. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Hansen had not arrived at this point. <br />David Dovscher,an Attorney representing Mr. Joyce who had purchased a <br />parcel of land from Tubbs Realty. MR. Tubbs was also present. Mr. <br />Doyscher explained that Mr. Joyce had purchased a parcel of land, <br />Tubbs Realty constructed a_h'e and a residue part of the lot was then <br />deeded back to Tubbs Realty. Mr. Doyscher had researched the title <br />and was aware of the moratorium on land splits but the deeds had been <br />prepared and were recorded at the Couty. Mr. Joy has since sold <br />the home to another person. Mr. Joyce is receiving tax statements for <br />the entire parcel. The Auditor's office will not split the land. <br />Mr. Tubbs noted that he did have a copy of the zoning laws at that <br />time and knew the rules that were ineffect. He felt at that time, <br />the lot was a buildable parcel of land. <br />Mr. Reinert asked Mr Hawkins for his opinion on this matter. Mr. <br />Hawkins said the original purchase was a legal transaction. The parcel <br />was conveyed back to Mr. Tubbs was an illegal lot and the parcel <br />remaining was also an illegal lot. The County Recorder does not <br />check the regulations of the City and therefore, this was recorded. <br />When this was sent to the tax department, the illegal split was <br />